[clxii. 45]

1820 June 18

Emancipation Spanish

S11. Rulers arguments

Those of the lowest order by thousands name those of a higher orders by scores who concurr in naming those units by whom when collected in a National Assembly the power of those by /among/ whom the highest offices and the patronage of the inferior /subordinate/ ones is shared. True /Good/. But from this branch of power such as it is how is it that to a sharer in it the value of a farthing - of a maravedi - can ever be received? A phantom of price such as this, is it possible that in the breast of one out of a hundred of one out of a thousand it can outweigh and compensate for the heavy and most acutely sensible burthen which is applied by and as both shew[s?] is inseparable from the possession of it? Will the great majority receive any /the least/ enjoyment from the possession of a power of the effects of which he has no perception and in which he does not feel in himself the exercise?
Similar Items
  • Title: [[clxii. 48] 1820 June 18 Emancipation]
    Description: [clxii. 48]

    1820 June 18

    Emancipation Spanish

    ' 11. Rulers Arguments

    3. Security mutual

    3. Argument 3. Against misrule in every shape the Constitution has provided a security; and the application and efficiency of this security is mutual and equal as between both hemispheres. In Spanish America as well as in Spain the subject many have a controuling influence and power over the conduct the ruling few and over the composition given to their body, and in both countries it is the same. In both countries the proportion between those in possession of supreme /paramount/ legislative power and those who appoint the hands by which that power is exercised is the same.

    Such is the principle of delusion the effect of which may be, to a certain degree and the object of which in the [...?] of [...?] to a certainty is - to cause the people of Spanish America to be content to be subjected to this dominion, or at any rate to cause the people of Spain subject many and ruling few together, to expect and believe that they will be so.
  • Title: [[clxii. 47] 1820 June 18 Emancipation]
    Description: [clxii. 47]

    1820 June 18

    Emancipation Spanish

    ' 11 2. People attached

    And in those former days, of those in this instance this /the supposed/ attachment had place be /let/ the number ever so great, what were the circumstances in which it had place, what in a word was the cause of it?

    They heard /were told/, and hearing /and being told they/ believed that by /from/ this illustrious dominion /source/ great profit accrued to them encreased to every body - to every body much was saved in taxes. They may now be told - they are told - and it being true, and incontrovertibly true, it is not likely that for ever it should continue to be disbelieved that so far from being in any degree eased they are in a vast degree burthened by it.

    If he will but look into the account, any man may know that he is burthened by their supposed or pretended easement he is burthened - burthened as truly and undeniably as by any debt he was ever charged with.

    Thus vanish all those delusions by which it is possible for any sharer in this dominion by application made to the people of /subject many in Spain/ and their regard for their own interest to reconcile them to the idea of suffering their ruler to accept or continue to possess were it offered to them by the people of Spanish America a dominion which can not be in such hands without being an instrument of oppression - of oppression not capable of not being inflicted, and sure to be inflicted upon the people of both nations.
  • Title: [[clxii. 42] 1820 June 12 Emancipation]
    Description: [clxii. 42]

    1820 June 12

    Emancipation Spanish

    '. Rulers arguments

    Virtues no security

    War how facilitated and promoted by sinister interests - interest begotten and authority derived /begotten/ prejudice. Hence you see in history. Murder for the purpose of depredation the true character of war for conquest, or continuance of forced dominion: [...? ...?] for self-emancipation - thus is it self defence against depredation.

    They will no more concurr in preserving the popular part of their /your/ Constitution, than the French sub-rulers under Lewis 18 under the Charter will concurr /have concurred/ in preserving the popular part of theirs. With all its imperfections the Constitution being too good for them will become a dead letter as the French Charter is in France, and the still more imperfect and inadequate Bill of Rights is in England J.B. [...? ...?

    ...?] the wrecks of that originally irregular imperfect and ideal plan its Constitution