1820 may 25

Emancipation Spanish

'.7. Rulers gainers

'.4. Rulers gainers

4. Power - vengeance

Vengeance supposes antecedent provocation: and provocation naturally leads to the supposition of injury: of undue suffering produced in the breast of one party /the one of two [...?] by the act of the other.

But the desire of producing suffering in the breast of one party may have place in that of another may have place and to a most deplorable extent actually have place, without any thing that can present itself to any one in the shape /under the name/ of injury - of injury done to the other.

If in this case the desire of producing suffering in the breast of another be to be termed vengeance, it must be termed vengeance produced by mere antipathy. It is at any rate a case where a desire of producing suffering in the breast of another is produced by mere antipathy, not produced in the mind of the antipathist by the supposition of any thing which by the antipathist himself could be spoken of as an injury done in any particular way, or as a provocation offered to himself.

To these heads belong the cases of antipathy on the score of taste, antipathy on the score of opinion and in particular antipathy on the score of opinion on the subjects of government and religion.

Of all modification /grounds/ of antipathy that which has difference of opinion on the subject of religion is the most important and the most transcendently mischievous and formidable. Be the provocation what it may vengeance on the score of personal provocation admitts of atonement, and through atonement the desire admitts of extinction, and the disagreement /[...?]/ of reconciliation. Antipathy on the score of religion admitts of no atonement, of no reconciliation. This placability which in other cases would be admitted to be a merit, would /is/ in this case be regarded and spoken of as a crime.
Similar Items
  • Title: [1820 May 20 Emancipation Spanish]
    Description: 1820 May 20

    Emancipation Spanish

    '.7. Rulers gainers

    '.4. Rulers gainers

    4. Power - vengeance

    4. Profit in the shape of power by application of it to the purpose of doing evil to any such persons to whom it happens to become objects of the means of vengeance, or of his ill-will in any other shape.

    The gratification afforded by vengeance is the gratification afforded to ill-will - to the desire of producing unhappiness /suffering/ in another, in the case where this desire has for its origin the opinion that that other has been the author of evil to the man /individual/ in question - the possessor of the supposed power.

    For /Of/ the giving exercise to this power of evil doing in this shape the means employed may be either in a direct way belonging to the superior functionary in question himself in virtue of his official situation, or it may be the continuation of the whole or of any part of the sum of the powers in all shapes possessed by the train of aspirants attracted to him as above.

    If on the one hand an official situation draws with /to/ it, as above a train of obsequious friends, on the other hand so does it in various ways a correspondent train of advisors. The greater the number the [...?] and the quality of ill-will with reference to him possessed by the train of individuals, the more frequent will and the more frequently you and to the greater degree success[?] naturally to the endeavours employed by those adversaries to bring down upon him suffering in all imaginable shapes: and [...?] correspondently frequent the demand created for the exercise of the power of vengeance.
  • Title: [2 Sept 1811 Jug. Util B.II]
    Description: 2 Sept 1811

    Jug. Util

    B.II.

    Ch. 6 7 8 Mischief. 5. Antipathy for pleasure

    §.1. Generalia

    1

    Ch. 6 8. Mischief 5. Producing antipathy towards others, for in the /partaking/ score of innoxuous pleasure act renamed antipathy from asceticism.

    In the present life the happiness and unhappiness /felicity and infelicity/ of human beings depends in a large proportion on their /the [...?]/ affections and disposition and conduct /as towards /relation to/ one another/ (of such portion of the entire species as come within the sphere of one anothers influence, on the external /exterior/ conduct, and hence in the inward affection in which that conduct has its use: in good offices /or/ and ill offices, and thence in good will and ill will.

    To promote in the breast of each man good will to all men is among the objects professed to be aimed at by them or some of them in whose discourses the Christian religion took its rise. But if such were the end aimed at, far from being conducive to that end have been some of the doctrines /affections/ that were soon embraced by and still continue to be prevalent among their followers.

    Exactly opposite to the affection /termed/ of good will is the affection /termed/ of ill-will or antipathy. With the exception therefore of the case in which ill-will /or rather ill-office/ towards one person or persons is necessary to the preservation of another, whatsoever opinion tends to exist and produce antipathy, tends in the same proportion to produce mischief in that shape.

    1.

    Mischief.5. Producing antipathy from asceticism. Felicity or infelicity depends greatly on good and ill offices, thence on good and ill will.

    2.

    To promote good will is among the professions of the author of Christianity: to promote ill will is the tendency of many of their doctrines. Promotion of ill will is every thing that tends to excite antipathy.
  • Title: [27 Nov 1813 Jug Util or Articles]
    Description: 27 Nov 1813

    Jug Util or Articles

    Ch. Punish t misseated & Atonement

    4

    §. Error Causes

    Unhappily the appetite for the spectacle of another's pain /human suffering/ is not confined to any such /comparatively/ narrow and /uniformly/ /clearly/ salutary case. Cases there are, and that to a deplorably extensive amount, in which the appetite [is produced] for this barbarous feast is produced, not only without antecedent experience of injury /received pain injuriously inflicted on the person by whom this appetite/ but without so much as the belief or supposition of it. Created by any difference in opinion, created by any difference in taste, what is this subject of difference by which it is not capable of being created?

    Unfortunately too when the appetite is thus /causeless/ groundless, produced without any specific /particular/ assignable cause produced as it were in the way of equivocal generation, it is in these cases that it is apt to be most [...?]: produced by injury, it has for its limits and its measure and its limit the magnitude of the injury: produced without injury, its magnitude is without limit: it has no other measure than the strength of the irascible appetite /dissocial passion/ in the breast in which this appetite has place and operates.