1
results found in
14 ms
Page 1
of 1
[clxiv. 113]
1820 June 25
Emancipation Spanish
?.8. Corruptive influence
5. Mode of operation
In a legal sense these men were, not any of them, murderers; in a legal sense they were not any of them robbers: in a legal sense they were not any of them pirates: in a legal sense they were not any of them suborners; in a legal sense they were not any of them persons suborned: in a legal sense they were not any of them transgressors, misdoers. Why so? How so? Because by law impunity was provided for them and all other men in their respective situations, in respect of whatsoever transgressions and misdeeds taking the /those/ words in a moral sense, they may have been guilty, in respect of whatsoever mischiefs and miseries by means of those misdeeds they may have been the authors of, impunity was and is pro
Similar Items
-
Title: [[clxiv. 109] 1820 June 24 Emancipation]Description: [clxiv. 109] 1820 June 24 Emancipation Spanish ?.8. Corruptive in fluence 5 Mode of operation Making War, in so far as not necessary for defence of the community against enemies /adversaries/ foreign or domestic, in particular to make war for conquest or for honour and glory, or for continuing dominion over the unwilling inhabitants of distant regions is to committ, in the moral sense of the English word murder, murder upon the largest scale: upon a scale proportioned to the extent of the hostilities. In England, if in any instance any such war has been made, any such murder committed, an assemblage of men to whom the appellation of suborners of murder and in that sense /way/ murderers belongs /may be seen to belong/ by an indisputable title, are the Monarch, the House of Lords and the House of Commons, composing all together the King in Parliament, the sovereign body of the State the body in which the whole of the paramount power of government is lodged. They are so as well in the active way as in the passive way - committers of the positive misdeed as well as of the correspondent negative misdeed on the supposition that profit in the shape of conquest, or prize money. Taken together they in that case on that supposition compose have composed a body of suborners, of corruptors of self-corruptors - the matter of corruption being in that case composed of the prize money together with the power in the shape of dominion the prime and preeminent fruit of conquest.
-
Title: [[clxiv. 110] 1820 June 24 Emancipation]Description: [clxiv. 110] 1820 June 24 Emancipation Spanish ?.8. Corruptive influence Mode of operation King sole suborner as to prize money by droits If without the /these/ special fruits of piracy the war with Spain had been begun, the proof of subornation would not have been so clear. By droits law not only foreigners were despoiled but his own seamen were defrauded of their rights Among the profits to an alledged suborner from the /a/ mischief to which by an act of his - by the exercise of /given to/ a power belonging to his situation he has given /been giving/ birth, suppose in ever such great number and variety other effects, good and /as well as/ bad, to have been resulting /flowing/ from the same measure still if there be a single profit /fruit/ that he puts /sweeps/ into his pocket /purse/ though it be no more than a single one to /from/ which no profit can be shewn to accrue to any interest other than his own personal or other individual interest - the act by which in giving exercise to such his power, and thereby to the profit in question a place in his purse, may be, and can not consistently with reason and justice be denied to be, an act of subornation, the act by which he has given birth to all those bad effects, a misdeed - a transgression in the moral sense, howsoever it may be in the legal sense - if destruction of human life be among the consequences /those effects/, an act of murder, and the suborner here in question, how so ever it be in regard to other persons whose acts were contributory to those same effects, a murderer: if destruction to human life by and in the way of war, a murderer upon the largest scale: and to /into/ the list of accessories to the murder and thence of murderers, of suborners of murder for the sake and purpose of the sinister profit thus derived from it, and of the exercisers of corruptive influence one upon another, and /or/ persons yielding to the force of such corruptive influence may with indisputable propriety appertain /be aggregated/ their names and not only of the functionary into whose purse the profits of murder are thus swept /put/ /lodged/ /gathered/ by means of the war, but of all others who, with their eyes open are by their conduct active or passive contributory to the continuance of the state of things in which this destruction and impoverishment to the many with the profits to the few has its rise.
-
Title: [[clxiv. 224] 1820 July 6 Emancipation]Description: [clxiv. 224] 1820 July 6 Emancipation Spanish ?.8. Corruptive influence Corruption without Corrupter R. Suborners of Misrule, all non-Opposers. In this case - in a case where the physical /sensible/ mischief and thence on the part of the common authors of it the moral guilt is at its maximum - at its highest pitch shall the self-conscious authors of it - shall those who, by the profit they derive from it, are suborned /stand engaged /determined// to give birth and encrease to it be on the field /score/ /in respect/ of moral guilt /delinquency/ holden guiltless? No surely - if either utility /public happiness/ or consistency are objects of regard. On the score of political - of legal - delinquency, yes: but in this impunity consists consists the source and basis and source of the grievance. Subornation has place, as above, in regard to almost every species of mischief - in the case of almost every species of political crime. Subornation as also observed, may be committed either by a positive act, or by a negative act - by an omission. In a negative sense he who through the operation of a crime /misdeed/ sees mischief about to conceive /have place/, is among the authors of that mischief - is a suborner with relation to that misdeed. Under the English Constitution, according to an acknowledgment not unfrequently repeated, the head functionaries by whom under the monarch the mass /branch/ power belonging to the Executive department of government is exercised are responsible - responsible at any rate to Parliament - not only for every mischievous act of any which they perform, but for every act recognized as good and necessary which they omitt to perform: to perform of themselves or to propose to Parliament, as the case may be.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1