[clxiv. 173]

1820 June 22

Emancipation Spanish

Interests opposite

King worst not best

This splendor is necessary - most indispensably necessary: more so by far than to the subject many the small quantity of the cheapest sustenance necessary to keep them from lingering but certain death. Necessary? and to what purpose? to the causing them to believe that the attribute of excellence is constantly to be found in a place which is the very last in which common sense undeluded by imposture would expect ever to find it.

And to what immediate purpose is all this pain taken to cause men to believe this attribute constantly present in a subject so essentially capable of receiving it? To what purpose? - to the purpose of obtaining submission upon false pretence: submission, and with it in the first place money - money in vast and continually encreasing masses, whether those from whom for this purpose it must continually be forced have or have not a sufficiency left for the continuation of their existence

To the apotheosis - to the ceremony by which a Roman tyrant was created a Heathen God - is substituted in this pretendedly wise and honest nation, a /the/ Coronation: a ceremony by which a man, who on his knees has under the direction of a priest been confessing himself a "miserable sinner" is created a God-upon-earth after the order of Sir William Blackstone. To be deceived to their ruin, not only women but men crowd, under an enormous pressure of expence and inconvenience in every shape, as moths crowd into the fatal flame of a lighted candle If by an earthquake actors and spectators were swallowed up together, and if by such a catastrophe the mixture of absurdity and impiety could be saved for ever from repetition, scarcely would the price be too great a price for the benefit.
Similar Items
  • Title: [4 Aug 1815 Jug True Miracles]
    Description: 4 Aug 1815

    Jug True

    Miracles

    (3)

     See whether for [...?] to reduce this to a dialogue?

    No narrative at all: a [...?], not this.

    Instead of the moon substitute a star—and say if in company with a dozen such trustworthy persons you yourself were to behold a star following or going before them wherever they went, just as a lantern with a lighted candle would do if it had a servant to carry it, and with this only difference viz. that it had no person to carry it, and that the elevation it kept to was higher than any person could reach to carry a candle or anything else, in that case would you or would you not believe in the existence of such a star?

    To a question to this effect the sort of answer which the nature of the case presents as a proper one and the only proper one has been already given.

    But on such an occasion as the present a counterquestion presents itself as not irrelevant or in any other sense improper. Would it be consistent with your notions of divine wisdom (or even with your notions of common human wisdom) that for the purposes of obtaining observance for any prescribed system of conduct, and to that end for producing reliance on any system of eventual threats or promises that God should create a star of that sort, and as soon as such intended effect had been produced, annihilate it. And so on, the same question in relation to all the several narratives so alledged to have been employed.
  • Title: [[clxiv. 100] 1820 June 20.]
    Description: [clxiv. 100]

    1820 June 20.

    Emancipation Spanish

    ?. Corruptive influence

    1. Persons operating

    3. Persons operated on

    Thence /Thus/ it is that to a pure Monarchy, the epithet /attribute/ pure belongs /appertains/ in more senses than one: it is pure, if not from all corruption: from all corruption /corruptive influence/ applied by or on behalf of the Monarch on those who are sharers with him in power, for the purpose or with the effect of engaging them to betray in his favour their trust /any trust of theirs/ Why? because his power has none to share in it.
  • Title: [[clxiv. 160] 1820 June 18 Emancipation]
    Description: [clxiv. 160]

    1820 June 18

    Emancipation Spanish

    ? Corruption

    Can all time work out the shame fixt on his character by his conduct in every thinking mind?

    Between the man /positive act of him/ by whom this state of things so incentive to misrule and murder upon the largest scale is created for the purpose, and the negative act of him who pocketing the profit of it year by year has it in his power not only to close his pocket against the profit, but to dry up the source of the profit when he pleases, where is the difference?