date

[clxiv. 193] 1820 June 23 Emancipation
[clxiv. 193]

1820 June 23

Emancipation Spanish

? Interests opposite

Corruption

Monarch and Sub rulers

Wilberforce

Religion Delusion

Now when a man not only is but even declares himself to be determined by every possible means to do his utmost to the keeping up /from disclosure/ an imposture - and such an imposture - an imposture productive of such consequences - whether it be religion or any other that is the topic what fair title to credence can belong to any declaration to any protestations he can make? of the existence of any real sincere persuasion what sort of evidence can any such protestation ever amount to? of /to/ any such evidence what is the probative force that with any colour of reason be attributed? Let him cry Christ Christ! let him cry Lord! Lord! till he is hoarse what evidence can any such cry assert of his believing the existence of any thing or any person that he thus speaks of? Of belief it is /affords/ not any more strongly probative evidence than does persecution for non belief to this or that alledged matter of fact afford any evidence of the corresponding belief. Not that of non-belief it will be any evidence: for of belief in things extraordinary /not probable/ sincerity in all its shapes is at least as frequent an accompaniment as unbelief /non-belief/: and if so it be, that in regard to the thing in question, whatever it be, belief actually has place /existence/ a phrase asserting the existence of it will not drive it into non-existence. The belief thus professed may therefore for any thing that man /men/ can know to the contrary be real. But be it ever so real who is it it /where are those/ that is the better for it? the believer himself? or any one else?
Similar Items
  • Title: [3 July 1812 Evidence Introd]
    Description: 3 July 1812

    Evidence Introd

    Introd

    Ch 23 Technically appropriate

    Of the subjects which seemed with propriety to belong to the design of a work on Evidence the following is if not a /an altogether/ compleat list, at any rate, a very extensive sample /ample [...?]/ - 1. Probitive force in what way capable of being measured by what circumstances encreasaed and by what diminished - 2. Causes of trustworthiness and untrustworthiness, in witnesses thence of belief and disbelief - 3. Securities for trustworthiness - 4. Mode of making use /application/ of these securities to such their purpose, on the occasion of the reception and extraction of evidence by judicial authority - 5. Circumstances by which the probative force of a species of evidence is diminished - viz such as the comparative untrustworthiness of the source - the remoteness of the evidence in question from the /its supposed source - viz. the seat of supposed perception/ source - the circumstance of it not having been subjected to the docimastic action of the securities for trustworthiness and the circumstance that as in the case of circumstantial evidence of the fact directly spoken to by the evidence is not the very fact in question, but some other fact, from its supposed connection with which the existence or non-existence of the very fact in question is inferred. 6. Means proper to be taken for securing the existence of evidence, evidence /means/ properly adapted to the purpose of securing in the breast of all persons whom it amy concern a belief /the persuasion/ of the existence of all such facts of which for the purpose of giving due effect to such rights and obligations as the legislature has thought fit to create it is necessary that a persuasion of their existence should be entertained.
  • Title: [[clxiv. 258] 1820 Aug. 9 Emancipation]
    Description: [clxiv. 258]

    1820 Aug. 9

    Emancipation Spanish

    Summary

    Corruptive influence

    Ask them [...?] to what use to what end is this compound of folly and imposture and folly? If they say any thing that is to the purpose it will be this - namely that imposture - imposture in general, and this imposture in particular - are /is/ indispensably necessary to good government. Imposture necessary to good government! Look to America! look to the United States! Is not this a government? is not that government a good one? if that be not a good government what other government ever was so, is so or ever can be? In that government then in this shape or any is there any thing of imposture? Answer. No: in the Constitutional part of the field of law. No: none whatever: for that the people who are governed by it have made for themselves. In the other parts - the non-penal /distributive/ and penal law /branches/ alas! yes: for the phantom of law by which real laws are in these parts of the field of law [...?] - to this phantom they imported with them from England, and have the weakness still to trust every thing else: not only this phantom they have imported from England but every year /year by year/ they continue to import its pernicious perjury, led as they continue to be by the man of law, who keep the oracle in their own custody, giving as its responses the answers which their /his/ own sinister interest dictates, feeling /beholding/ a mine of wealth /gold/ in the darkness and uncertainty which its monstrous form /their monstrous forms/ perpetuates
  • Title: [28 Aug. 1806 Evidence Whether]
    Description: 28 Aug. 1806

    Evidence

    Whether one psychological fact can be redutionary of another?

    1. Fear. (i.e. pain of apprehension) of consciousness

    1. Confusion of mind of [...?] conscienceness: Answer confusion of mind in fear which for its source the circumstance of the cause[?] suspected, or any other source of danger.

    II. Motive, of Intention

    2. Motive of intentionably[?]? Not immediately; but exposure to the action of such and such a motive: but there is physical evidence.

    III. [...?] of Motive

    3. Intentionably, of motive? - Yes, in case answer as above.

    IV. Of position, of Intention

    4. Habitual enmity, sexual desire i.e. habitual disposition to experience pain & pleasure of it - circumstantial evidence of intentionality: viz: intention to do the acts tending to the gratification of the above propensities.

    V - Falshood or Reticence, of Fear

    5. Non-response, False response &c. The psychological fact of which they are immediately evidentiary, is fear: fear of some evil to result from the disclosure. But this fear may have had other causes [...?] of /than the/ particular guilt[?] in question.

    VI. Consciousness, of the past agency in question.

    Fallaé[?], by confusion is surely produced by religion

    6. Self insinuative[?] consciousness is not absolutely conclusive evidence of the act. Consider case of religious insanity.

    7. So in theft. consciousness i.e. belief of want of little may be conscious. A man may steal his own goods believing them to be anothers.

    #3

    At each link in the chain of causality, the indication is liable to be fallacious. Therefore the probative force will be less and less as the number encreases[?].

    In the indication of the probative force Of the several species of circumstantial evidence there can be little or nothing said[?]. The evidentiary property /quality/ of the evidentiary fact would not exist, if the existence of it were not generally obvious. What the legislator can do in the way of instruction for the Judge is little more than the bringing the whole mass of doctrine together, for the purpose of affording him that /to him comprehensive view at the commencement of his [...?]/ of the subject - that sense of intellectual power which is so useful to the right discharge of his functions, and which otherwise might for some time be wanting /deficient/.

    Taking any one of these points of facts by itself, the probative force will be apt to strike the reader at first sight as being incompleat. Accordingly it is seldom without a concurrence of several articles of circumstantial evidence there the answer will present itself as strong enough to be conducive.