1
results found in
79 ms
Page 1
of 1
1820. Sept r. 24
Emancipation Spanish
'. 5 Corruptive influence
But as it is impossible that by a war sucessful or unsuccessful so as the ill
success does not pass certain limits a limited[?] Monarch should not in respect of
his particular and sinister interest be a gainer - gainer by the increase given to
the matter /mass/ of coercive force, gainer by the increase given to the matter of
coercive influence, so it is impossible that to /in the breast of/ a Monarch so
situated, there should not be a perpetual tendency to plunge the nation into a war,
on every occasion in which a prospect of carrying it on without loss to himself
presents /should present/ itself. And thus it is that a nation which under a mixt
monarchy suffers itself to be plunged into an unjust and unnecessary war, hastens
whatever be the effect of the war its own enslavement.
Since therefore under a mixt monarchy war without any endeavours or designs to that
effect, /on the part of the monarch and those around him expressly deputed to notice/
the government is continually sliding on in its course to the gulph of despotism, it
follows that under a mixt monarchy, but for measure expressly taken for the purpose
of giving it a contrary tendency, such sooner or later will infallably be the effect.
Such measures so as they be but successful, and carried into effect without
bloodshed depredation and destruction to a preponderant ammount can not be too
efficient and effective can not raise /give/ the government too great a move /an
advance/ up the hill on the summit of which pure represenstative democracy has its
seat. Why? because that is the only form of government which is good, that is the
only form of government which is stable: pure monarchy is raised upon /seated in/ a
crater, under which a fresh[?] volcano may at any at any time burst forth: mixt
monarchy is ever upon the slide sliding downward towards this gulph in which rises
the elevation in the crater of which despotic monarchy is situated
Similar Items
-
Title: [1820 Sept. 24 Emancipation Spanish]Description: 1820 Sept. 24 Emancipation Spanish '. 5. Corruptive influence A single war may suffice to convert into a pure /[...?]/ despotic monarchy, the most popular mixt monarchy that can be devised: the standing army which it has necessitated may of itself suffice to produce that effect by coercion and terror, without the addition of any of the matter of corruptive influence, the mass which it heaps up of the matter of corruptive influence in the shape of lucrative offices, power-girt offices and factitious dignities may of itself suffice for this without the /more/ addition to the mass of coercive force and intimidation. Without sufficient and appropriate explanation and restriction the bare utterance of the words honour and glory national honour, national glory national honour is an attempt to plunge the nation to the gulph of despotism, by means of murder, depredation and destruction committed upon the largest scale. There are but two cases in which personal courage displayed in a successful engagement /combat/ or a successful war ought to be rewarded with any such approbation as is [...?] by the use and application of the word honour or the word glory: where it is displayed in the course of resistence made to oppressive forces within, and where it is displayed in the course of resistence made to oppression from within, or in the endeavour to exclude it and keep it excluded for the future: in a word in the course of a war purely defensive, defence against foreign aggression and defence against misrule.
-
Title: [[lxxxiv. 156] 1822 Feby 6 Codification]Description: [lxxxiv. 156] 1822 Feby 6 Codification Offer. 4¼o ?.5. Admission Universal Members unapt Whether the Monarchy be pure or mixt the interest of the Monarch is essentially a sinister interest. Of every mixt Monarchy the perpetual tendency is to become a pure Monarchy: and in case of tranquillity, sooner or later such tendency can not consistently with the nature of man fail of being carried into effect. Of the sinister interest when coupled with adequate power capable of giving effect to it /to its tendency/ the ultimate effect is /may be stiled/ the consummation of the sinister sacrifice The consummation of the sinister sacrifice has place when by any addition made to the quantity of the matter of wealth endeavoured to be exacted for his own use from the other members of the community no further addition can actually be made: when taxation has arrived at its ne plus ultra™`. In every pure Monarchy taxation is at every point of time at its ne plus ultra™` with reference to that time. In a mixt Monarchy in which taxation has not yet arrived at that point it is still tending towards that point. It may have arrived at that point and still continue a mixt Monarchy. But as in this case there will be a continual striving to add to the quantity of wealth collected by taxation, and on the part of the people a correspondent repugnance and reluctance to /in the course of the endeavours to/ overcome /surmount/ that reluctance there will be many continual additions to the quantity of power: till at length all power of resistance being taken from all the other members of the community the mixt Monarchy will have been been converted /be passed/ into a pure one. For any length of time the forms of the mixt Monarchy may remain and will be likely to remain: but the condition of the people will not be in any respect the better for these forms. The forms of mixt government remained under the tyrant Caesars.
-
Title: [1818 Aug. 27. §.7 Things as they are]Description: 1818 Aug. 27. §.7 Things as they are {or First lines} §.7. Conclusion 1 Seat of the profligacy and signs[?] - the daily newspapers - Options - 1. Persevering[?] obsequiousness. 2. […?] 3. Emigration[?]. §.7. Concluding Observations Conclusions The conclusion is, that Monarchy is an essentially and incurably vitious form of government. That a pure Monarchy is the only one capable of a perpetual continuance. That a mixt Monarchy and in particular the English is the only one capable of a perpetual continuance. At present under the form of a mixt Monarchy the Monarch governs his interest predominates. Under Parliamentary Reform still under the same form, the people would govern, their interest would predominate. Either it would do this, or it would do nothing /This is what it would do, or nothing/ This would be an imperfect and more or less inconvenient arrangement: the only arrangement which is perfect and exempt from inconvenience in every shape is pure Representative Democracy. But, owing to the state of existing possessions, this arrangement, if at all, could not be effected without mischief to a vast and indefinite extent. But if, in the course of the endeavour to substitute good government to misrule, war - civil war - were to take place, mischief to that amount or greater would already have taken place: in that case every arrangement short of pure representative democracy would be a palpable absurdity. What remains to be considered is - what will be the state of the nation supposing Parliamentary Reform not to have taken place. Of Both Lords and other proprietary Members of the House of Commons, this last state would be not as at present the better, but the worse for the minute. But in this case the disadvantageous change would not in general be expected by this or that man till after his death: the result will be to make the of things as they are, and leave posterity to take care of itself.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1