1820. Aug. 14

Emancipation Spanish

Summary

Mode of riddance

What, can nothing be done for them but by putting a force upon

/forcing/ their inclinations /will/? Can nothing be done for them by the influence of

understanding upon understanding? by taking thought? Think what you have done already

done for Naples! for Naples, and what without expence in any shape; without expence

/[...?/ even in the shape of thought. To the Neapolitans - to these strangers -

already you have given - and without price /without so much as a thought, as well as

without any money price/ - a boon which in value is beyond all price. You have given

them your constitution. Upon whomsoever it was forced upon the people it was not

forced by you whose glorious work it was not forced upon any body. With this example

before your eyes - and, if your eyes are /can be/ tired with looking at it, mine

never can - with this example before your eyes, think whether it be true, that it is

in no other way than by tyrannizising over them, that by governing them, and if they

resist, destroyed by tyrannized over them, that a people can be served.

No, my friends think not to do by your kinsmen what the continental despots did by

unhappy Poland! - leave to the Despots of Russia - leave to the Despots of Prussia,

leave to the Despot of Austria - leave to the Feeder-general of all Despotism to

assume that it is only by destroying one part of their people and robbing the rest

that a people can be served: fearing not that servitude under a despotism is the only

security for good order the only remedy against anarchy.
Similar Items
  • Title: [1820 Aug. 6 Emancipation Spanish]
    Description: 1820 Aug. 6

    Emancipation Spanish

    Summary

    Now say your Rulers new brethren of America. We have thought better

    on /of/ it. No longer will we be your Masters? No: that we desire to be excused from

    being any longer. Your help-mates - yes, that we will readily and gladly be. Such

    influence as in your eyes may for your advantage, that we will gladly gladly

    exercise. But what influence? the influence of will on will? /that will exercises/

    the influence of force fear and corruption? No, but the influence of understanding on

    understanding only:- whatsoever influence on your conduct in consideration of the

    information within our reach, your understanding /judgement/ may for your own sake

    think fit to allow to ours. Influence we will still exercise on you if such be. Our

    influence you shall still have the benefit of, if in your eyes it is a benefit.

    What then /Then/ shall we do by /for/ you? As your and our former tyrants dealt by

    you. No: but as we have just done already by /for/ Naples. We will deal with you in

    the same manner and on the same terms. Our Constitution if you approve it - our

    Constitution, in so far as it may be found applicable to your circumstance shall be

    yours: Our laws, if you approve them, these too in so far as they may be found

    applicable to your circumstances, shall be yours.
  • Title: [1822 April 6 Rid Yourselves]
    Description: 1822 April 6

    Rid Yourselves

    Lett 15 Relinquish m honorable

    Letter 15. By perseverance, Spain would be dishonoured among nations:

    by relinquishment honored. Relinquishment honourable.

    Spaniards!

    Can imagination form to itself any thing by which man, or nation,

    will be more surely or thickly covered with dishonor, than by a mixture of injustice,

    folly, sullenness, cravingness and impotence? impotence manifest in the eyes of the

    whole civilized world? impotence no less conspicuous than uncontrovertible? My

    friends, so long as your rulers pursue their present course, this dishonor will it

    not be yours.

    Reverse the tablet. This unexampled shame, would you exchange it for

    equally unexampled honor? The course - the no less sure course is equally before your

    eyes. How inevitably soever the general result would be brought about by already

    existing causes, whatsoever were the course pursued by them, - still, were they but

    seen taking an active part in giving promptitude and facility to it, and the

    characters of frankness and cheerfulness were seen stamped upon the face of their

    measures, novelty would give its lustre to the utility of the sacrifice; honor

    positive honor - would be amongst the rewards of it. Yes: of service so unexampled,

    honor not less unexampled could not fail to be the recompense. Many a government, and

    even without being forced, has for one cause or other given subjects of its own to

    other governments: Since the days of Actius the Anglo-American Democracy excepted, no

    where has Government ever given them to themselves.

    Thus much as to honour. As to glory, so barbarously has the word been abused - so

    replete with suffering and crime the ideas that still cling to it - rapine and

    murder, devastation & oppression - all upon the largest scale, are so

    commonly understood to be the merits of which this fictitious entity is the reward -

    Such being the word not without this caution could I bring

    myself so much as to mention the thing as a fit object of

    your regard. But, if any thing to which this name is

    applicable be to your rulers an object of desire, here it is at their command: most

    compleatly at their command: glory, of the newest character

    and purest kind:- the glory of political

    continence:

    [clxxii. 326]

    1822 April 6

    Rid Yourselves

    Lett 15 Relinquish m honorable

    Letter 15. By perseverance, Spain would be dishonoured among nations:

    by relinquishment honored. Relinquishment honourable.

    Spaniards!

    Can imagination form to itself any thing by which man, or nation,

    will be more surely or thickly covered with dishonor, than by a mixture of injustice,

    folly, sullenness, cravingness and impotence? impotence manifest in the eyes of the

    whole civilized world? impotence no less conspicuous than uncontrovertible? My

    friends, so long as your rulers pursue their present course, this dishonor will it

    not be yours.

    Reverse the tablet. This unexampled shame, would you exchange it for

    equally unexampled honor? The course - the no less sure course is equally before your

    eyes. How inevitably soever the general result would be brought about by already

    existing causes, whatsoever were the course pursued by them, - still, were they but

    seen taking an active part in giving promptitude and facility to it, and the

    characters of frankness and cheerfulness were seen stamped upon the face of their

    measures, novelty would give its lustre to the utility of the sacrifice; honor

    positive honor - would be amongst the rewards of it. Yes: of service so unexampled,

    honor not less unexampled could not fail to be the recompense. Many a government, and

    even without being forced, has for one cause or other given subjects of its own to

    other governments: Since the days of Actius the Anglo-American Democracy excepted, no

    where has Government ever given them to themselves.

    Thus much as to honour. As to glory, so barbarously has the word

    been abused - so replete with suffering and crime the ideas that still cling to it -

    rapine and murder, devastation & oppression - all upon the largest scale, are

    so commonly understood to be the merits of which this fictitious entity is the reward

    - Such being the word not without this caution could I

    bring myself so much as to mention the thing as a fit

    object of your regard. But, if any thing to which this name

    is applicable be to your rulers an object of desire, here it is at their command:

    most compleatly at their command: glory, of the newest

    character and purest kind:- the glory of political

    continence:

    [clxxii. 327]

    1822 April 6.

    Rid Yourselves

    Letter 15 Relinquishment honorable

    continence: glory of self mastery and self-sacrfice. Yes: of the very

    purest kind: for pure is not

    here, as so commonly it is, an unmeaning, or what is worse a mischievously deceptious

    expletive: pure from all alloy uncontaminated by human suffering - uncontaminated by

    evil in any shape - this is its meaning here: It belongs not to the number of those

    vague generalities, which fly into the clouds to make their escape from scrutiny: it

    fears not either moral, logical, or arithmetical scrutiny: it shrinks not from the

    probe, it invites it.

    Straining still to reign - these rulers of yours - to reign in

    countries placed by nature beyond their reach - straining with frog-like ambition,

    coupled with frog-like impotence, they would make you

    burst, and after all, not reign over any thing, unless it were over you, after they had ruined you: abdicating, they would nobly reign:

    reign along with you - reign in the hearts of millions -

    reign in the page of history - reign to the end of time.

    Of this only true political glory, let Portugal - let even Naples -

    let even Piedmont - as they have already been a source, be in their turn a school to

    you. From all these countries already have you reaped two harvests of this pure

    glory. In you they beheld and followed the first example of national self-defence: of

    national and successful insurrection against regal despotism: preserving with

    unexampled magnanimity - preserving, and even fixing, upon the throne, the man by

    whom were they to fail, they were but too sure they would be destroyed or ruined, as

    so many others that went before them, had been, and as they had actually been, since.

    In this, you out-shine even the men of the Anglo-American United States. For neither

    crowns, nor sceptres, not thrones, nor coronets, nor mitres, nor any other of those

    instruments of state witchcraft, by which their European kinsmen continue still

    blinded and entralled, had ever been in their view, as they have all along been in

    your's.

    This

    [clxxii. 328]

    1822 April 6.

    Rid Yourselves

    Lett. 15 Relinquishment honorable

    This was your first harvest: the other was not long behind. From you

    it was that all these countries received the faculty of choosing their own laws: from

    you it was they received the laws themselves. From you they received that branch of

    law - the Constitutional - which contains in its bosom all the others. Mistake me

    not, my friends. It is not of the work itself that I am speaking here: of that I have

    spoken elsewhere. It is not of the work but of its effects on the reputation of the

    workmen and their fellow countrymen that I am speaking here

    These glories, which you have thus reaped already from all those nations - not to speak of those other nations that

    have burned, and still burn to follow them - these glories have not cost you any

    thing. How much more valuable to you would be this, which,

    with such ardent longing, I desire to see you reap from your Ultramaria! Not only, as I have so plainly shown you - not only would it

    cost you nothing, but it would save you, as I have shewn you, from an unfathomable

    abyss of expence.

    Tarnish not, then, my friends - tarnish not all this glory, by

    suffering your rulers to exemplify in their conduct, any longer, that disgraceful

    compound which it has been so painfully necessary for me to keep holding up to your

    view, the compound, made up of frantic concupiscence and prostrate impotence.

    Think, whether, if they still continue to provoke, and harass, those

    whom they can not master - think whether they will not make the breach day by day

    wider and wider: the breach between you and these your kinsmen, whom nature, if

    unthwarted by blind ambition, would have numbered among the most constant of your

    friends. Think, whether at this rate, in every line of conduct instead of placing

    themselves as near to you, it will not every day be more and more determinately their

    object, to keep themselves at as great a distance from you as possible.

    On the other hand, do but cease to persecute them, your conduct will

    still be the model of theirs: in every track it will be a pleasure, and a pride to

    them, to follow you. Your Ultramaria will still be to you what Portugal is - what

    Naples and Piedmont would have been - and let me hope will again be: Oh yes: that and more: in language, institutions,

    customs,

    [clxxii. 329]

    1822 April 7.

    Rid Yourselves

    Letter 15 Relinquishment honorable

    customs, religion she is already

    yours: laws, so they be not forced upon her - forced upon

    her by your rulers, for their own profit not for yours - laws, she will be at least as prone to receive from those same rulers, whoever

    they may be, as it will be of use to her to be. More than forty years have elapsed,

    since the men of the Anglo-American United States shook off the yoke of our Kings:

    the yoke - the fouler yoke - of our lawyers, is even hugged by them, and remains

    still upon their necks.

    Ridding yourselves of this nightmare, what a lesson will you thus

    read to England! By the establishment of a real

    Constitution, thus blowing away all fictious ones, one great lesson you have already

    given her: the example which I am thus urgent with you to set her, would be a second.

    Not that, till the present system of corruption has dissolved in its own filth, she

    will follow any such example, or any other good one. No: where in every speech a man

    makes, he makes a Constitution of his own to suit the purpose of it, none agreeable

    to him will be a wax-like Constitution, which, on each occasion, he can thus cast

    into a different mould, than one made of more rigid materials would be, though he

    were himself to have the making of it. No: so long as England continues unreformed,

    never, will her rulers give up any the most burthensome dependence they can contrive

    to keep - never will they give it up, so long as it continues to be a source of

    depredation and corruptive influence,- unless it be for a still more burthensome one.

    Make yourselves heard then my friends, make yourselves heard by your

    rulers. Say to them - "Speak thus to your and our Ultramarian kinsmen. We have erred:

    we have repented. We have done wrong by you: we cease to do so: we will never do so

    more. Not as masters, do we address you, but as friends. Cease to be angry with us:

    fly not from our embrace: while we were wronging you, we were doing by you no

    otherwise than as others have always done - all others who have been alike situated

    in relation to those whom they have thus wronged. The wrong has but too many

    examples: the reparation we are thus making you has, down to this time, never been

    made by man

    [clxxii. 330]

    1822 April 7.

    Rid Yourselves

    Letter 15 Relinquishment honorable

    No:- Our will shall no longer seek to govern

    yours: our understanding, such as it is - our experience -

    our advice - will always be at your service. Buried be in oblivion every past

    difference; every past act of unkindness; with eyes of mutual sympathy, and hands

    ready for mutual help let us look jointly to the future. The same ancestry, the same

    language, the same customs: these we always have had, and shall continue to have: we

    have still the same religion: till lately we have had and may still continue to have,

    the same laws; the same institutions: with conjunct and mutually communicated

    howsoever distant endeavours, let us at all times make them as much better as we are

    able. All these same bonds of sympathy and connection - the same ancestry, the same

    languages, the same laws, the same institutions, the same religion,- to some men

    these were reasons for keeping you in subjection: with us they are reasons for

    leaving you free; for leaving you as free as we are.

    Henceforward, what other nation can ever be so much to either of us, as each of us is

    to the other and ever will be?"

    My friends! were your rulers to speak thus, would they, could they,

    thus lay themselves lower than they are? Where such is the that error takes, where

    such is the end it leads to, which part is the most honorable - to persevere in it,

    or to confess and quit it?

    [Sheet enfolding clxxii. 331-344]

    RId Yourselves

    Letter 16

    The Relinquishment would be honorable.

    Slave Trade

    [clxxii. 331]

    1821 July 19 Corrected Apr. 1822

    Rid

    Relinquishment honorable

    Slave trade

    Such disinterestedness not in practice

    Witness U.S.

    I have spoken of the jargon by which when carried on upon the largest

    scale oppression and depredation oppression partly for the gratification of selfish

    pride and the lust of power partly for the purpose of depredation are in use to be

    defended: in use to be thus defended and for this plain reason that the nature of the

    case affords not in the way of needs any thing better by which by possibility they

    can be defended.

    When the Slave trade is to be defended jargon in this form is no

    longer applicable. In secrecy unoffending human beings and dealing by them as cattle

    are dealt with though with [...?] more suffering to them, there is neither honour,

    nor glory nor dignity: no natural /antique/ rights no antique distinction

    sovereignty, supremacy in the case.

    What then in this case, is the word? The vocabulary of the political

    jargon. The vocabulary of the political branch of the [...?] language has been

    searched and no more than one word applicable to this case has been found in it.

    Necessity is the word is necessity: a word in and by which where it is rightly

    applicable one argument of no mean cogency is expressed /conveyed/.

    In this or that country the continuance of the slave trade that is

    the purchase of men of black complection from who in their native climate have them

    in their power is matter of necessity: it is necessary to the cultivation of the

    province to the existence of its population their existence could not continue /go

    on/ without it.

    [clxxii. 332]

    1821 July 19

    Rid

    Relinquishment honorable

    Slave trade

    Necessary? Oh yes doubtless it is: many are the things many are the

    persons to which it is necessary. But what are those things /things what are they?/

    what are the persons what are they The things are - making pecuniary profit by

    injustice /oppression and murder by injustice/ in the most flagitious of its forms:

    the persons those for the obtaining of this flagitious profit in this shape are not

    only content but reasonably ardent in their endeavours to continue or enable others

    to continue in the practice of this flagitious injustice.

    By the word necessity - by any other word

    although like beads in a rosary /aves or paternosters/ it was day by day and every

    hour of the day - repeated would the injustice would the selfish barbarity be in the

    smallest degree alleviated? /[...?]/

    If, and upon so vast a scale by this or any other word injustice

    coupled with the superlative of cruelty be defended and vindicated by it upon the

    like wickedness when committed upon a less extensive scale.

    Try it upon housebreaking for [...?] /the like purpose of

    depredation,/ try it upon highway robbery, coupled or not coupled with murder

    according as by his obstinacy or his audacity the passenger /sufferer/ makes or does

    not make the murder of him necessary.

    Here you have /In this case have you not/ necessity, here you have it

    in a form as cogent as irresistible as unanswerable as in the case of the Slave

    trade? Robbing black men of their liberty, of that blessing /possession/ in which the

    whole of their property from the beginning to the end of life is included is to the

    Slave dealer necessary to his living in the stile in which it is his wont to live:

    robbing the traveller of the money he has about him is necessary to the highwayman:

    necessary to his living in the stile in which it is his wish to live.

    [clxxii. 333]

    1821 July 19

    Rid

    Relinquishment honorable

    Slave trade

    Aiding, abetting, assisting, supporting and engaging black men in

    that course of murder which by its being carried on upon a scale of a certain

    magnitude - is covered with honour and called war is to the slave dealer and his mode

    of living in stile a matter of absolute necessity: of each gang bought murdering a

    portion more or less considerable by a course of torment of water or similar duration

    is another course of conduct necessary to the same economical end. On the other hand,

    not less necessary in the case of obstinacy or resistance on the part of the

    traveller is every now and then the destruction of his life.

    Meantime if so it be that by the necessity applying to his case the

    Slave-dealer is justified in his offence /morally/ so much as extenuated, not only is

    the Highwayman, murder added or not added by him to depredation justified; but in

    comparison of the Slave-dealer /trader/ yes and of his accomplices /his aiders,

    abetters, supporters, engagers/ in all manner of ways and in every country the

    highwayman - even the cut throat highwayman he is a Saint.

    The man who sitting on the opposite side of a table tells me that the

    continuance of the Slave Trade is necessary - necessary to him, as to those with whom

    he is in a community of interest or assistance, and that it is by the sense of that

    necessity that by such /whatever/ arguments as he can bring to bear he stands engaged

    to support it what is it that prevents him from rifling my house and stripping it of

    every thing in it that takes his fancy and to secure him his life against the

    consequences of my resistance /self-defence/ destroying it? What but the force of

    punishment at the hands of the law: or that of the question, the fear of that

    disrepute which may attach upon such his conduct for want of his having custom - that custom which applies to the case of the Slave

    Trade for a cloak to it?

    [clxxii. 334]

    1821 July 20

    Rid

    Lett 10

    Slave Trade

    There is a certain thing we are every now and then hearing of

    /talking about/ called tyranny. My friends what say you to

    it? In regard to it what is the state of your affections? /relation to it how stand

    your affections/ What a question! say you: as if we could do otherwise than abhor it.

    Good: but how abhor it? simply and absolutely? or only subject to certain

    distinctions and not otherwise. In so far /Whatever/ as we are the victims of it, oh

    yes: there we do abhor it: but where are the authors of it or among the instruments

    of it, there the case changes: in short where we suffer /wherever we are sufferers/

    by it we hate it, as all wise and humane men do of course /wise and humane as we are

    can not do otherwise/ but where /in so far/ as we in our own opinions at least profit

    by it, /reap an advantage from it/ there so far the case is quite reversed. Tyranny

    exercised over us is a most wicked /a bad/ thing: honour where that all would forbid

    our endurance of it. Tyranny exercised by us or for us is a good thing: honour could

    not endure our parting with it: no means of any thing we did would with any propriety

    be termed tyranny: which however you must acknowledge is not the case: that which in

    others might be tyranny, with /in/ us is just exercise of legitimate rights. Tyranny

    it might be in others to hold a distant nation in subjection in the hope of squeezing

    money out of them: but in us it is but just exercise of legitimate rights. Tyrany it

    might be in others to keep men or to keep others in houses or fields in a state of

    slavery: but property is a sacred right: and in no such dealing is but the exercise

    of that sacred right.

    [clxxii. 335]

    1821 July 19

    Rid

    Relinquishment

    Slave Trade

    Religion

    Religion indeed! Take for his habitual /every day/ occupation Make

    murder and robbery upon the largest scale and profess /dictate/ at the same time that

    religion is in his eyes an object of regard. The profession of him is it sincere or

    insincere? /insincere or sincere/ If insincere what is to be thought of him? If

    sincere what is to be thought of religion of that religion that has place in his

    breast: A religion which suffices not to restrain me from the habitual /constant/

    practice of the most flagitious enormities what can it be good for what the value of

    it what the uses of it? Murder and robbery and murder by any number of masses can

    they be atoned for? What then are we to think of masses? Be it what it may with

    references to the happiness of a future life - of that life in comparison of which

    the present is but as a grain of sand in the universe as it affects the happiness of

    the present life is it anything /would it be such a religion to/ better than a

    nuisance? the prevalence of it any thing better than a public calamity? the support

    of it than a public grievance?

    [clxxii. 336]

    1821 July 19

    Rid

    Rid

    Slave Trade

    But if thus indefensible /inexcusable/ is the conduct of those

    Colonists who are partakers in the Slave Trade how much more inexcusable is that of

    your Masters if by your loss they continue partakers in that abomination by affording

    or striving to afford protection to those who persevere in staining themselves with

    it. In continuing it, in so far as by continuing it they make greater profit /of the

    sums capital/ than they could by any other means, they are not against self-regarding

    prudence, they are not against any virtue other than those which are comprehended

    under the head of Effective Benevolences /[...?] [...?]/ Only to the unhappy victims

    of that system of murder is their conduct injurious.

    But your Rulers, in act or in endeavour so long as they extend to the

    provinces engaged in that traffic their protection such as it how much further are

    the is their conduct from being excusable?

    [clxxii. 337]

    1821 July 19

    Rid

    slave Trade

    You rank yourselves with the rulers of France - like to Ultras - the

    circumspect despots of England.

    Say not such disinterestedness as you preach - such virtue as and

    without expence on your part you call for the exercise of at ours is at too high a

    pitch for the fraility of human nature? Call not upon us to soar above the level of

    the commmon nature: it is sufficient /we content ourselves/ with what is practicable,

    to us to be upon a level with the rest of mankind.

    Spaniards! this will not serve you. Think not that by abstaining from

    depredation and murder in this fix you place /would place/ yourselves above the level

    of human nature: all that you would do would be the ceasing to be as you are at

    present, in a deplorable degree below it.

    [clxxii. 338]

    1821 July 19

    Rid

    Relinquishment

    Slave holding indicted

    Slave Trade

    Emancipation is one thing: cessation of purchase is another. Neither

    to the aggregate /common/ benefit nor even to the benefit of the Blacks alone would

    /immediate/ emancipation immediate or other than gradual emancipation be practicable.

    Not /Quite other/ so cessation of purchase.

    For my part to speak of impossibilities if at that price, and not at

    any less price in addition to emancipation the establishment of the Blacks in /under/

    a government such as that of the Anglo-American United States could be effected

    gladly as a /in the character of/ indispensible means to that end would I see the

    White population every man and woman and child extirpated, put to death.

    [clxxii. 339]

    1821 July 20 Omitted 9 April 1822

    Rid

    Relinquishment honorable

    Slave Trade

    Well then: in this result you see another advantage - (and if there

    be any moral feeling in you a prodigious one you will see it is) from the proposed

    relinquishment. While you retain the dominion, or any claim upon it, this foul stain

    /that moral leprosy/ cleaves to you: rid yourselves of the incumbrance, and you rid

    yourselves of the leprosy along with it. Think not that upon any other terms, even

    were /supposing it/ you were so desirous it would be in your power then to purify

    yourselves. Among these your /these many/ former dependencies there are some who are

    to such a degree tainted with it, that as surely as they saw in you a disposition to

    put an end to that enormity, so surely, howsoever disposed to cleave to you, they

    would break loose. Then indeed /Thereupon/ would come the excuse derived from

    /comprised out of one /the/ abuse of the word necessity. it is necessary to keep on

    foot this practice: for otherwise these subjects of ours would no longer be so. This

    we must not endure, so long as by any thing we can do we can retain them under our

    subjection; this would be an infraction of our Constitution: of that Constitution

    which every body has sworn to observe.

    [clxxii. 340]

    1821 July 20

    Rid

    Relinquishment honorable

    Slave Trade

    Sworn to observe? Oh yes: sworn to perform all and singular /this

    together with all the/ impossibilities which may be seen swarming in it.

    Look at Article 4. 'The nation is obliged to preserve and protect, by

    wise and just laws, the civil liberty and the property, besides all other legitimate

    rights, of all the individuals of which it is comprized.'

    What? all the Citizens? all that are its Citizens and no others? No: no such

    restriction does it contain: individuals is the word: not

    ciudadanos is the word. Now then the human beings whose

    skin is of a darker colour than your own - are they not individuals? When they cease to be individuals, then will you /your

    Representatives/ cease to have guaranteed their /to them/ civil

    liberty: then should any one say to you - you are tyrants not haters of

    tyranny, hypocrites not men of sincerity then will you be able to clear yourselves of

    the opprobrium /their /imputations/ reproaches/, and call them calumny, and call the

    authors of these calumniators.

    Slavery under you or any subjects /known subject/ of yours is it what

    you mean by this same civil liberty? /slavery such as that in which they keep those

    whom for that purpose they have purchased instead of cattle/ Well then go yourselves

    to Negro land, put yourselves under the power of those whom by such purchase you now

    get under yours - by that means /in that way/ you may secure to yourselves the

    blessing you thus denunciate and without the complication and embarrassment of

    Constitutional Codes made only to be violated or neglected.

    [clxxii. 341]

    1821 July 20

    Rid

    Relinquishment honorable

    Slave Trade

    Casting from you this leprosy /Having healed yourselves/ you would

    thus be that which so long as it cleaves to you you can not be - an object of respect

    as well as sympathy to the whole of the English nation and the honest part of the

    French and /but/ especially to the Anglo-American United States to that nation whose

    place in the seat of moral and intellectual worth it stands so high above both..

    Spaniards /My friends/ why should I dissemble to /conceal from/ you those reproaches

    which so incessantly wound my ears - those reproaches in which it is said that had it

    not been for your nation and another which I can not bring my pen to trace this stain

    upon Christianity /the religion of yours/ /civilised society/ would years ago have

    been washed out. Such are the reproaches with which my ears are wounded: and what can

    I say /find/ to clear myself of them? tell me I beseech you what, for with all my

    affection for you with all partiality for your cause as often as this topic comes on

    the carpet so often am I mute.

    [clxxii. 342]

    1821 July 20

    Rid

    Relinquishment honorable

    Slave Trade

    Speaking of the French nation, I say the honest

    part: for it is but too true and sufficiently notorious that in that nation

    there are those who having made a vow to make slaves of their own countrymen regard

    with horror any proposition /measure/ the effect of which would be to set limits to

    the number of their slaves With you these men I am satisfied are no more in honour

    than with me. But on this [...?] subject whatsoever may be said against them on the

    score of barbarity /inhumanity/ and injustice, nothing can be said against them on

    the score of inconsistency and /or/ hypocrisy. They have not sworn as your

    Representatives by Articles 4 and 13 and your King has sworn to take for the end of

    their government the happiness of all the individuals belonging to the nation: they

    have not sworn to preserve civil liberty to all those individuals. In their eyes the

    proper end of government is - not the happiness of all, but the happiness of one,

    together with that of such few others, to whom in consideration of a certain mass of

    property which no matter by what means they have secured /contrived/ to get into

    their possession, it shall please him to let in for a share /loan/ suffer to enjoy at

    his expence /share with him/ a share in the means of happiness.

    And these same men - what /in their eyes/ are you yourselves in their

    eyes? A gang /land/ /nation/ of rebels and traitors and rebels whose blood flowing

    from a scaffold would to that of the vast majority of their fellow citizens be the

    most delightful of all spectacles to their eyes. Such are the men with whom so long

    as any part of Ultramaria is called yours you hold community of principle and

    affection and endeavour: but with this difference that what with exceptions too

    inconsiderable to be worth taking into account /mention/ they do but wish to be, you

    are.

    [clxxii. 343]

    1821 July 20

    Rid

    Relinquishment honorable

    Slave Trade

    Now then my friends if honour has any place /so it be that honour

    has/ in your wishes, there it is for you: there it is for you as soon as between you

    and the Slave-buying provinces the connection is dissolved. There it is for you and

    of the purest kind.

    Note well too that by so doing you will rid yourselves not only of

    the abomination of Slave-buying, but of the abomination of Slave-holding and by so

    doing you will thus in the scale of true honour place yourselves not only above the

    French nation not only above the English nation but above the Anglo-American nation.

    For with them /this young and virtuous nation/ though this least bad part of the

    double system is matter of regret and shame, it is still theirs: for with them that

    which /necessity/ in your mouths would be but pretence has for the present but too

    incontestable an existence, has still that hold which with honesty and sincerity they

    are continually employed in loosening to the utmost of their power.

    You would rid yourselves I say of Slave-holding or I can /will/ not

    suppose /I see no reason to suppose/ that is for your own use that you continue to do

    what you still do towards keeping up that practice. It is no part of your new scheme

    of good government to import Black men into Spain to serve as slaves in your own

    houses. But It is only because if you did not in breach of your Constitutional Code

    suffer them to keep Black men slaves in their houses /if you would not suffer them to

    treat others as slaves/ and on their lands they would not (you fear) behave to you as

    subjects - this is the cause and the only cause by which the connection you have with

    the system of tyranny is continued.

    [clxxii. 344]

    1821 July 19 Omitted 9 Apr. 1822

    Lett Conclusion?

    The Relinquishment [...?]

    Slave Trade

    Spaniards /Men of Spain/

    Think not that by shutting his eyes, and giving the reins to passion,

    to self-tormenting no less than mischievous passion it is in the power of man to

    convert wrong into right, justice into injustice, cruelty into humanity, rashness

    into prudence, blindness into discernment, impossibility into accomplishment. Think

    not that by shutting his own a man can shut other eyes. Fancy not that any more than

    your own Don Quixote merely by shutting his eyes or driving spurs into his horse

    could any of you more effectually than Don Quixote did put to death a wind-mill or

    stop the sails of it in their course.

    Think /Fancy/ not that by anger on your part by anger passion intense

    and furious and inexerable the nature of things or the nature of man can be changed

    Talking and asking thus/

    They think to raise themselves, in fact they sink themselves.

    Nonsense will not in Spanish any more than in French or English raise a man. For the

    moment perhaps, yes: but no sooner is the nonsense seen to be nonsense than that

    moment is at an end.

    The more you praise yourselves, not the more, but the less, will you

    be praised by others. Self-praise, be the quantity in which it is daubed on ever so

    unconscionable /enormous/ will not stick. Even in this accomplishment, think not that

    you do or can make yourselves stand foremost. We have those who can outdo you in it.

    We have been longer in the practice of it. Look at our Tories: look at our Whigs. See

    with what facility, honor, glory, splendour, dignity pass with us for reasons. For

    reasons for our holding our pockets open to be pillaged: for reason for hiring men,

    by hundreds of thousands, to kill others in equal multitudes multitudes none of whom

    ever gave them offence.
  • Title: [1820 August Emancipation Spanish]
    Description: 1820 August

    Emancipation Spanish

    Summary

    Creoles claim as good

    Time it is that, care you ever so little for their feelings and their interests -

    care you ever so little for what /that which/ in relation to them are the dictates of

    justice it is impossible that you can care less for them than they are cared for by

    the confederated despots: for these despots who in [...?] guaranteed to your rulers

    their despotism over these same colonies who often guaranteed to the traitors the /a/

    constitution founded on aristocratical despotism and English corruption but still

    less deformed the preceding despotism, looked on and laughed when they saw it

    conclude who had it been their desire and endeavour to render the master /themselves/

    whom they served objects of abhorrence to all mankind /nations/ could scarcely have

    pursued a course better adapted to that purpose.

    But if ever the force of public opinion at large - the opinion of the subject many

    were on the score of a man's /a rulers/ personal interest worth attending to it is

    now: and when men /a man/ have nothing to gain by injustice, nor by any particular

    and strong prejudice are set against justice, justice is never /seldom/ altogether

    without some hold upon their /his/ regard. If then, in all persons who are without

    personal interest and without delusive prejudice, your claim to that dominion should

    appear utterly unreasonable it may be not altogether, even with a view to your own

    interest unworthy of your considerations whether by an opinion /a general persuasion/

    to this /that/ effect /of the injustice of this claim/ your chance of prevailing in

    case of a contest, with /against/ those your kinsmen, or any portion of them on this

    ground, might not be apt to be lessened by it.