date

1820. Sept. 6 Emancipation Spanish
1820. Sept. 6

Emancipation Spanish

'. 10. Amendment impossible

Such is the impossibility of timely correction of any abuse of the delgated power

[...?] in those distant regions . Now for an example /a conception/ of the

consequences

A recent incident comes to my aid. A Minister of the King A Secretary /One of the

Secretaries of/ State and dispatch - the Secretary at War sends to Cadiz an order for

the disbanding of the Army - of the /that/ Army by which the first declaration in

favour of the Constitution was made. The Cortes is sitting: the order is revoked: the

Minister displaced. Now suppose no Cortes sitting: the time chosen for the order,

that on which the sitting having but just terminated, anarchy so far as depends on

the vacation of /absence of/ the Cortes has the longest range. For the maintenance of

the Constitution, the further continuance of that Army, for a longer or shorter

portion of time seens to have been regarded as necessary. Suppose it so: the Army

disbanded what more would you have seen or Constitution or Cortes? The Constitution

could have been burnt by the hands of the hangman, and, the Members of this second

Cortes would have been dealt with as those of the first were.

Now suppose [...?] governed /Buenos Ayres kept in subjection/ by a Spanish army, and

an order /a [...?]/ sent from Madrid to disband it. Sent by a Minister, but, no

matter by what motive in the giving to the province independence, or transferring it

to other hands: to the Brasilian Government for instance. Responsible to the Cortes

responsible by Art. was the Minister by whom this order was sent. of This

responsibility what could

be the effect.

Blaquiere's Letter 26 Aug 1820

Art. 222
Similar Items
  • Title: [1820. Sept. 4 Emancipation Spanish]
    Description: 1820. Sept. 4

    Emancipation Spanish

    Summary

    Mode of riddance

    By this magnanimity Spain would set the example of England. Shew

    England what true /pure/ glory is - and that it is not wild, absurd, or visionary, or

    visionary and senseless, a magnanimity quiescent not condemned by prudence. Leave

    cut-throat glory to Wellingtons and Bonapartes.

    To call back to mind the so nearly analagous expedition the commision that went no

    longer than last year went to Buenos Ayres and Chile from the United States. With no

    complacent eye of course was it regarded by your rulers of those days /that time/:

    with very different eyes would it, on the above supposition be regarded the rulers of

    present time /by men in that same situation in the present state of things/. By the

    most frugal of all governments, when the sole object was to know whether the people

    in question were in a condition to be traded with and contracted with the expence of

    that commission was not grudged. As little would the expence of the like commission

    be grudged to every other Province in Spanish America be grudged, when to that object

    would of course be added /of course/ that of actually forming treaties with them; and

    when /especially if/ to a commission and order to that effect were added if not one

    order, at any rate /the least/ an understood permission to render towards the

    adopting of a popular constitution to the circumstances of the province in question,

    whatsoever assitance might by the joint dictates of /under the guidance of/

    benevolence and prudence be rendered at the hands of superior to inferior

    experience.
  • Title: [1820 June 7 Emancipation Spanish]
    Description: 1820 June 7

    Emancipation Spanish

    '.6. Creoles repugnant

    What answers that possess any chance of proving satisfactory to those by whom the questions are put can be given to any such question is more than I am able to conceive.

    As little can I conceive what it is that can prevent their putting to themselves and to one another all /any or all of/ these questions any or all of them. In /Among/ books and pamphlets which will be printed and circulated among them, will not there be those that will be teeming with such questions, with applications and in detail all over the field of trade, and in a word all over the field of governments Among /From/ the men of other nations that will be flocking ot them, and in particular from the Citizens of the United States will they not be continually hearing the equivalent of such /those/ questions?

    Under the exploded government - the government of avowed despotism there was an answer to this. No publication shall in time future any more than in time past /discoveries in writing or in speech having for its object or its tendency, the giving rise or support to any such claims/ be suffered to find utterance in any part of any one of their Colonies: no foreigner shall be suffered to set his foot in any one of them any where. But under the new government principles incomparable with any such exclusion over Ireland. Already in Cuba, in Buenos Ayres, in Chile, in Venezuela, or New Granada not to speak of other provinces there are swarms of foreigners In Buenos Ayres and in Chile, they are declared by anxious for free communication with the United States.
  • Title: [1822 April 18 Rid Yourselves]
    Description: 1822 April 18

    Rid Yourselves

    Lett. 18 Relinquish. Plan

    ' 7. Restrictions, none.

    Morn. Chron. 10 April 1822 U.S. Secretary of State to Congress as to

    recapture of Ultramarian Independence.

    My friends in relation to this /now I am upon this/ principle, from

    me /between me whom I relate to you/ a curious /remarkable/ enough coincidence. While

    occupied in penning this Letter scarcely had I finished the paragraph in which I have

    recommended to you consideration in the character of a model /in general terms of

    the/ conduct of the conduct of the general government of the Anglo American United

    States in came the English daily paper the Morning Chronicle for 17 April 1822 in

    which the disclaiming with a statement in it by which evidence is furnished of the

    adoption given by this general government there to the liberal principle - the

    disclaiming of all commercial preferences

    From Mr. Forbes a Citizen of New York writing to Mr. John Quincy

    Adams Secretary of State an account is given of a conversation held at Buenos Ayres

    with Mr. Rivadavia Secretary of State for that independent State. /chief in the

    management of the affair at present/ I next read to him says Mr. Forbes from the

    instruction of the 12th July 1820, the magnanimous feeling with which the Government

    of the United States disclaimed any wish to barter an acknowledgment of the

    independence of those provinces for any exclusive advantages in their commerce; at

    the same time their firm reliance that no such exclusive privileges would be granted

    to other nations to the prejudice of the United States.

    In the same document is given an account from Mr. Brent Charge des Affaires of the

    United States dated Madrid July 10 1820 giving an account of a conversation of his

    with Mr. Racenga one of the Commissioners of General Bolivar head of the Columbian

    Republic. "He (Mr. Ravenga) says Mr. Brent [...?] number speaks of the surprize of

    Mr. Ravenga, surprize at the rejection of the pacific overtures made by him to the

    Court of Madrid. He (continues Mr. Brent) spoke of the ignorance in that country

    (Spain) of the real state of Spanish America of their [...?] and their prejudices,

    with warmth, and particularly of the expression of the King in his speech, respecting

    Spanish America"