1
results found in
21 ms
Page 1
of 1
1820. Sept. 3
Emancipation Spanish
Summary
Transfer to U.S.
Whether of the Spanish American territory there be any other part which in the estimation of the United States would afford them any advantage - advantage in that same or any other shape, it is not for me to say with any decision. For the purpose of the argument I will /may however be permitted/ assume the affirmative: at any rate the proposal carries no absurdity - for it carries not so much as novelty - upon the face of it.
Will then your rulers make the overture to their rulers, you make to them this proposal. Give us so much money we will not only give up to you all our claims to such or such a province naming it but, on your acceding to certain stipulations in favour of the inhabitants, we will do what depends upon us towards recommending the proposal to their favour and obtaining their consent. You have no objection to the admitting new States into your confederacy. You are in use to do so. You are in use to take in young States to nurse, till they are to a certain degree grown up till they are in such a degree of strength as to be fit to go alone and train up in your own calling /way/ till they are of age, at which time you take them into partnership. Well then if the proposal be agreeable to you take the good people of this province: with regard to the land as yet unoccupied in it you shall stand in our place. But, as it is not our meaning to sell them for slaves so neither is it yours to buy them for slaves. It is not by force and taxing them for money to put into your pocket that you look for your profit, but in that land to which without loss to any one the goodness of your Constitution - of that Constitution which you let them into the benefit of - will give a value. It must therefore be with their consent if they become members of your confederacy, not otherwise.
Similar Items
-
Title: [1820 Sept. 3 Emancipation Spanish]Description: 1820 Sept. 3 Emancipation Spanish Summary Transfer to U.S. When the extinction is /instrument is/ to be performed by governing men against their interests or endeavours, We are for extinguishing anarchy is the slang of malefactors in high places. Come, have patience with me and I will tell you how if the circumstances /demands/ of another country continue as they have been, you /your rulers/ may compass /ZS/ points at once, pecuniary easement /relief/ to you, good government and content to a portion more or less considerable of your kinsmen in America, advantage to a third party, and glory pure and unexampled glory to you and to themselves. If there be a well and popularly governed Confederacy of States willing to give money for the valuable land in this or that Spanish American Province contiguous to its own territory, transfer the province to that confederacy if it can be done with the consent of the inhabitants, to that Confederacy. Start not at this proposal. In every part of it, it has (you will see) for its basis incontestable experience. The State /foreign Confederacy/ I have in view, you see already, it is that of the Anglo-American United States. Every body knows what they gave gave to Napoleon for Louisiana. Every body knows what they wish to give to your own King for the Floridas. I say to give: for giving up claims to money is in so far as the money would otherwise have been obtainable, giving the money. In both instances, they found a convenience /an advantage/ which for shortness I will call a Geographical convenience. In what way it was convertible /expressable/ as supposed in pounds shillings, and pence in Dollars and Cents in what way it was brought home to individual feelings we have no need to enquire. Trust these people and rulers together /subject many and ruling few/ - for these, subject many and ruling few are one - trust them as to these matters: for they are not men to give money for moonshine.
-
Title: [1822 April 6 Rid Yourselves]Description: 1822 April 6 Rid Yourselves Lett 15 Relinquish m honorable Letter 15. By perseverance, Spain would be dishonoured among nations: by relinquishment honored. Relinquishment honourable. Spaniards! Can imagination form to itself any thing by which man, or nation, will be more surely or thickly covered with dishonor, than by a mixture of injustice, folly, sullenness, cravingness and impotence? impotence manifest in the eyes of the whole civilized world? impotence no less conspicuous than uncontrovertible? My friends, so long as your rulers pursue their present course, this dishonor will it not be yours. Reverse the tablet. This unexampled shame, would you exchange it for equally unexampled honor? The course - the no less sure course is equally before your eyes. How inevitably soever the general result would be brought about by already existing causes, whatsoever were the course pursued by them, - still, were they but seen taking an active part in giving promptitude and facility to it, and the characters of frankness and cheerfulness were seen stamped upon the face of their measures, novelty would give its lustre to the utility of the sacrifice; honor positive honor - would be amongst the rewards of it. Yes: of service so unexampled, honor not less unexampled could not fail to be the recompense. Many a government, and even without being forced, has for one cause or other given subjects of its own to other governments: Since the days of Actius the Anglo-American Democracy excepted, no where has Government ever given them to themselves. Thus much as to honour. As to glory, so barbarously has the word been abused - so replete with suffering and crime the ideas that still cling to it - rapine and murder, devastation & oppression - all upon the largest scale, are so commonly understood to be the merits of which this fictitious entity is the reward - Such being the word not without this caution could I bring myself so much as to mention the thing as a fit object of your regard. But, if any thing to which this name is applicable be to your rulers an object of desire, here it is at their command: most compleatly at their command: glory, of the newest character and purest kind:- the glory of political continence: [clxxii. 326] 1822 April 6 Rid Yourselves Lett 15 Relinquish m honorable Letter 15. By perseverance, Spain would be dishonoured among nations: by relinquishment honored. Relinquishment honourable. Spaniards! Can imagination form to itself any thing by which man, or nation, will be more surely or thickly covered with dishonor, than by a mixture of injustice, folly, sullenness, cravingness and impotence? impotence manifest in the eyes of the whole civilized world? impotence no less conspicuous than uncontrovertible? My friends, so long as your rulers pursue their present course, this dishonor will it not be yours. Reverse the tablet. This unexampled shame, would you exchange it for equally unexampled honor? The course - the no less sure course is equally before your eyes. How inevitably soever the general result would be brought about by already existing causes, whatsoever were the course pursued by them, - still, were they but seen taking an active part in giving promptitude and facility to it, and the characters of frankness and cheerfulness were seen stamped upon the face of their measures, novelty would give its lustre to the utility of the sacrifice; honor positive honor - would be amongst the rewards of it. Yes: of service so unexampled, honor not less unexampled could not fail to be the recompense. Many a government, and even without being forced, has for one cause or other given subjects of its own to other governments: Since the days of Actius the Anglo-American Democracy excepted, no where has Government ever given them to themselves. Thus much as to honour. As to glory, so barbarously has the word been abused - so replete with suffering and crime the ideas that still cling to it - rapine and murder, devastation & oppression - all upon the largest scale, are so commonly understood to be the merits of which this fictitious entity is the reward - Such being the word not without this caution could I bring myself so much as to mention the thing as a fit object of your regard. But, if any thing to which this name is applicable be to your rulers an object of desire, here it is at their command: most compleatly at their command: glory, of the newest character and purest kind:- the glory of political continence: [clxxii. 327] 1822 April 6. Rid Yourselves Letter 15 Relinquishment honorable continence: glory of self mastery and self-sacrfice. Yes: of the very purest kind: for pure is not here, as so commonly it is, an unmeaning, or what is worse a mischievously deceptious expletive: pure from all alloy uncontaminated by human suffering - uncontaminated by evil in any shape - this is its meaning here: It belongs not to the number of those vague generalities, which fly into the clouds to make their escape from scrutiny: it fears not either moral, logical, or arithmetical scrutiny: it shrinks not from the probe, it invites it. Straining still to reign - these rulers of yours - to reign in countries placed by nature beyond their reach - straining with frog-like ambition, coupled with frog-like impotence, they would make you burst, and after all, not reign over any thing, unless it were over you, after they had ruined you: abdicating, they would nobly reign: reign along with you - reign in the hearts of millions - reign in the page of history - reign to the end of time. Of this only true political glory, let Portugal - let even Naples - let even Piedmont - as they have already been a source, be in their turn a school to you. From all these countries already have you reaped two harvests of this pure glory. In you they beheld and followed the first example of national self-defence: of national and successful insurrection against regal despotism: preserving with unexampled magnanimity - preserving, and even fixing, upon the throne, the man by whom were they to fail, they were but too sure they would be destroyed or ruined, as so many others that went before them, had been, and as they had actually been, since. In this, you out-shine even the men of the Anglo-American United States. For neither crowns, nor sceptres, not thrones, nor coronets, nor mitres, nor any other of those instruments of state witchcraft, by which their European kinsmen continue still blinded and entralled, had ever been in their view, as they have all along been in your's. This [clxxii. 328] 1822 April 6. Rid Yourselves Lett. 15 Relinquishment honorable This was your first harvest: the other was not long behind. From you it was that all these countries received the faculty of choosing their own laws: from you it was they received the laws themselves. From you they received that branch of law - the Constitutional - which contains in its bosom all the others. Mistake me not, my friends. It is not of the work itself that I am speaking here: of that I have spoken elsewhere. It is not of the work but of its effects on the reputation of the workmen and their fellow countrymen that I am speaking here These glories, which you have thus reaped already from all those nations - not to speak of those other nations that have burned, and still burn to follow them - these glories have not cost you any thing. How much more valuable to you would be this, which, with such ardent longing, I desire to see you reap from your Ultramaria! Not only, as I have so plainly shown you - not only would it cost you nothing, but it would save you, as I have shewn you, from an unfathomable abyss of expence. Tarnish not, then, my friends - tarnish not all this glory, by suffering your rulers to exemplify in their conduct, any longer, that disgraceful compound which it has been so painfully necessary for me to keep holding up to your view, the compound, made up of frantic concupiscence and prostrate impotence. Think, whether, if they still continue to provoke, and harass, those whom they can not master - think whether they will not make the breach day by day wider and wider: the breach between you and these your kinsmen, whom nature, if unthwarted by blind ambition, would have numbered among the most constant of your friends. Think, whether at this rate, in every line of conduct instead of placing themselves as near to you, it will not every day be more and more determinately their object, to keep themselves at as great a distance from you as possible. On the other hand, do but cease to persecute them, your conduct will still be the model of theirs: in every track it will be a pleasure, and a pride to them, to follow you. Your Ultramaria will still be to you what Portugal is - what Naples and Piedmont would have been - and let me hope will again be: Oh yes: that and more: in language, institutions, customs, [clxxii. 329] 1822 April 7. Rid Yourselves Letter 15 Relinquishment honorable customs, religion she is already yours: laws, so they be not forced upon her - forced upon her by your rulers, for their own profit not for yours - laws, she will be at least as prone to receive from those same rulers, whoever they may be, as it will be of use to her to be. More than forty years have elapsed, since the men of the Anglo-American United States shook off the yoke of our Kings: the yoke - the fouler yoke - of our lawyers, is even hugged by them, and remains still upon their necks. Ridding yourselves of this nightmare, what a lesson will you thus read to England! By the establishment of a real Constitution, thus blowing away all fictious ones, one great lesson you have already given her: the example which I am thus urgent with you to set her, would be a second. Not that, till the present system of corruption has dissolved in its own filth, she will follow any such example, or any other good one. No: where in every speech a man makes, he makes a Constitution of his own to suit the purpose of it, none agreeable to him will be a wax-like Constitution, which, on each occasion, he can thus cast into a different mould, than one made of more rigid materials would be, though he were himself to have the making of it. No: so long as England continues unreformed, never, will her rulers give up any the most burthensome dependence they can contrive to keep - never will they give it up, so long as it continues to be a source of depredation and corruptive influence,- unless it be for a still more burthensome one. Make yourselves heard then my friends, make yourselves heard by your rulers. Say to them - "Speak thus to your and our Ultramarian kinsmen. We have erred: we have repented. We have done wrong by you: we cease to do so: we will never do so more. Not as masters, do we address you, but as friends. Cease to be angry with us: fly not from our embrace: while we were wronging you, we were doing by you no otherwise than as others have always done - all others who have been alike situated in relation to those whom they have thus wronged. The wrong has but too many examples: the reparation we are thus making you has, down to this time, never been made by man [clxxii. 330] 1822 April 7. Rid Yourselves Letter 15 Relinquishment honorable No:- Our will shall no longer seek to govern yours: our understanding, such as it is - our experience - our advice - will always be at your service. Buried be in oblivion every past difference; every past act of unkindness; with eyes of mutual sympathy, and hands ready for mutual help let us look jointly to the future. The same ancestry, the same language, the same customs: these we always have had, and shall continue to have: we have still the same religion: till lately we have had and may still continue to have, the same laws; the same institutions: with conjunct and mutually communicated howsoever distant endeavours, let us at all times make them as much better as we are able. All these same bonds of sympathy and connection - the same ancestry, the same languages, the same laws, the same institutions, the same religion,- to some men these were reasons for keeping you in subjection: with us they are reasons for leaving you free; for leaving you as free as we are. Henceforward, what other nation can ever be so much to either of us, as each of us is to the other and ever will be?" My friends! were your rulers to speak thus, would they, could they, thus lay themselves lower than they are? Where such is the that error takes, where such is the end it leads to, which part is the most honorable - to persevere in it, or to confess and quit it? [Sheet enfolding clxxii. 331-344] RId Yourselves Letter 16 The Relinquishment would be honorable. Slave Trade [clxxii. 331] 1821 July 19 Corrected Apr. 1822 Rid Relinquishment honorable Slave trade Such disinterestedness not in practice Witness U.S. I have spoken of the jargon by which when carried on upon the largest scale oppression and depredation oppression partly for the gratification of selfish pride and the lust of power partly for the purpose of depredation are in use to be defended: in use to be thus defended and for this plain reason that the nature of the case affords not in the way of needs any thing better by which by possibility they can be defended. When the Slave trade is to be defended jargon in this form is no longer applicable. In secrecy unoffending human beings and dealing by them as cattle are dealt with though with [...?] more suffering to them, there is neither honour, nor glory nor dignity: no natural /antique/ rights no antique distinction sovereignty, supremacy in the case. What then in this case, is the word? The vocabulary of the political jargon. The vocabulary of the political branch of the [...?] language has been searched and no more than one word applicable to this case has been found in it. Necessity is the word is necessity: a word in and by which where it is rightly applicable one argument of no mean cogency is expressed /conveyed/. In this or that country the continuance of the slave trade that is the purchase of men of black complection from who in their native climate have them in their power is matter of necessity: it is necessary to the cultivation of the province to the existence of its population their existence could not continue /go on/ without it. [clxxii. 332] 1821 July 19 Rid Relinquishment honorable Slave trade Necessary? Oh yes doubtless it is: many are the things many are the persons to which it is necessary. But what are those things /things what are they?/ what are the persons what are they The things are - making pecuniary profit by injustice /oppression and murder by injustice/ in the most flagitious of its forms: the persons those for the obtaining of this flagitious profit in this shape are not only content but reasonably ardent in their endeavours to continue or enable others to continue in the practice of this flagitious injustice. By the word necessity - by any other word although like beads in a rosary /aves or paternosters/ it was day by day and every hour of the day - repeated would the injustice would the selfish barbarity be in the smallest degree alleviated? /[...?]/ If, and upon so vast a scale by this or any other word injustice coupled with the superlative of cruelty be defended and vindicated by it upon the like wickedness when committed upon a less extensive scale. Try it upon housebreaking for [...?] /the like purpose of depredation,/ try it upon highway robbery, coupled or not coupled with murder according as by his obstinacy or his audacity the passenger /sufferer/ makes or does not make the murder of him necessary. Here you have /In this case have you not/ necessity, here you have it in a form as cogent as irresistible as unanswerable as in the case of the Slave trade? Robbing black men of their liberty, of that blessing /possession/ in which the whole of their property from the beginning to the end of life is included is to the Slave dealer necessary to his living in the stile in which it is his wont to live: robbing the traveller of the money he has about him is necessary to the highwayman: necessary to his living in the stile in which it is his wish to live. [clxxii. 333] 1821 July 19 Rid Relinquishment honorable Slave trade Aiding, abetting, assisting, supporting and engaging black men in that course of murder which by its being carried on upon a scale of a certain magnitude - is covered with honour and called war is to the slave dealer and his mode of living in stile a matter of absolute necessity: of each gang bought murdering a portion more or less considerable by a course of torment of water or similar duration is another course of conduct necessary to the same economical end. On the other hand, not less necessary in the case of obstinacy or resistance on the part of the traveller is every now and then the destruction of his life. Meantime if so it be that by the necessity applying to his case the Slave-dealer is justified in his offence /morally/ so much as extenuated, not only is the Highwayman, murder added or not added by him to depredation justified; but in comparison of the Slave-dealer /trader/ yes and of his accomplices /his aiders, abetters, supporters, engagers/ in all manner of ways and in every country the highwayman - even the cut throat highwayman he is a Saint. The man who sitting on the opposite side of a table tells me that the continuance of the Slave Trade is necessary - necessary to him, as to those with whom he is in a community of interest or assistance, and that it is by the sense of that necessity that by such /whatever/ arguments as he can bring to bear he stands engaged to support it what is it that prevents him from rifling my house and stripping it of every thing in it that takes his fancy and to secure him his life against the consequences of my resistance /self-defence/ destroying it? What but the force of punishment at the hands of the law: or that of the question, the fear of that disrepute which may attach upon such his conduct for want of his having custom - that custom which applies to the case of the Slave Trade for a cloak to it? [clxxii. 334] 1821 July 20 Rid Lett 10 Slave Trade There is a certain thing we are every now and then hearing of /talking about/ called tyranny. My friends what say you to it? In regard to it what is the state of your affections? /relation to it how stand your affections/ What a question! say you: as if we could do otherwise than abhor it. Good: but how abhor it? simply and absolutely? or only subject to certain distinctions and not otherwise. In so far /Whatever/ as we are the victims of it, oh yes: there we do abhor it: but where are the authors of it or among the instruments of it, there the case changes: in short where we suffer /wherever we are sufferers/ by it we hate it, as all wise and humane men do of course /wise and humane as we are can not do otherwise/ but where /in so far/ as we in our own opinions at least profit by it, /reap an advantage from it/ there so far the case is quite reversed. Tyranny exercised over us is a most wicked /a bad/ thing: honour where that all would forbid our endurance of it. Tyranny exercised by us or for us is a good thing: honour could not endure our parting with it: no means of any thing we did would with any propriety be termed tyranny: which however you must acknowledge is not the case: that which in others might be tyranny, with /in/ us is just exercise of legitimate rights. Tyranny it might be in others to hold a distant nation in subjection in the hope of squeezing money out of them: but in us it is but just exercise of legitimate rights. Tyrany it might be in others to keep men or to keep others in houses or fields in a state of slavery: but property is a sacred right: and in no such dealing is but the exercise of that sacred right. [clxxii. 335] 1821 July 19 Rid Relinquishment Slave Trade Religion Religion indeed! Take for his habitual /every day/ occupation Make murder and robbery upon the largest scale and profess /dictate/ at the same time that religion is in his eyes an object of regard. The profession of him is it sincere or insincere? /insincere or sincere/ If insincere what is to be thought of him? If sincere what is to be thought of religion of that religion that has place in his breast: A religion which suffices not to restrain me from the habitual /constant/ practice of the most flagitious enormities what can it be good for what the value of it what the uses of it? Murder and robbery and murder by any number of masses can they be atoned for? What then are we to think of masses? Be it what it may with references to the happiness of a future life - of that life in comparison of which the present is but as a grain of sand in the universe as it affects the happiness of the present life is it anything /would it be such a religion to/ better than a nuisance? the prevalence of it any thing better than a public calamity? the support of it than a public grievance? [clxxii. 336] 1821 July 19 Rid Rid Slave Trade But if thus indefensible /inexcusable/ is the conduct of those Colonists who are partakers in the Slave Trade how much more inexcusable is that of your Masters if by your loss they continue partakers in that abomination by affording or striving to afford protection to those who persevere in staining themselves with it. In continuing it, in so far as by continuing it they make greater profit /of the sums capital/ than they could by any other means, they are not against self-regarding prudence, they are not against any virtue other than those which are comprehended under the head of Effective Benevolences /[...?] [...?]/ Only to the unhappy victims of that system of murder is their conduct injurious. But your Rulers, in act or in endeavour so long as they extend to the provinces engaged in that traffic their protection such as it how much further are the is their conduct from being excusable? [clxxii. 337] 1821 July 19 Rid slave Trade You rank yourselves with the rulers of France - like to Ultras - the circumspect despots of England. Say not such disinterestedness as you preach - such virtue as and without expence on your part you call for the exercise of at ours is at too high a pitch for the fraility of human nature? Call not upon us to soar above the level of the commmon nature: it is sufficient /we content ourselves/ with what is practicable, to us to be upon a level with the rest of mankind. Spaniards! this will not serve you. Think not that by abstaining from depredation and murder in this fix you place /would place/ yourselves above the level of human nature: all that you would do would be the ceasing to be as you are at present, in a deplorable degree below it. [clxxii. 338] 1821 July 19 Rid Relinquishment Slave holding indicted Slave Trade Emancipation is one thing: cessation of purchase is another. Neither to the aggregate /common/ benefit nor even to the benefit of the Blacks alone would /immediate/ emancipation immediate or other than gradual emancipation be practicable. Not /Quite other/ so cessation of purchase. For my part to speak of impossibilities if at that price, and not at any less price in addition to emancipation the establishment of the Blacks in /under/ a government such as that of the Anglo-American United States could be effected gladly as a /in the character of/ indispensible means to that end would I see the White population every man and woman and child extirpated, put to death. [clxxii. 339] 1821 July 20 Omitted 9 April 1822 Rid Relinquishment honorable Slave Trade Well then: in this result you see another advantage - (and if there be any moral feeling in you a prodigious one you will see it is) from the proposed relinquishment. While you retain the dominion, or any claim upon it, this foul stain /that moral leprosy/ cleaves to you: rid yourselves of the incumbrance, and you rid yourselves of the leprosy along with it. Think not that upon any other terms, even were /supposing it/ you were so desirous it would be in your power then to purify yourselves. Among these your /these many/ former dependencies there are some who are to such a degree tainted with it, that as surely as they saw in you a disposition to put an end to that enormity, so surely, howsoever disposed to cleave to you, they would break loose. Then indeed /Thereupon/ would come the excuse derived from /comprised out of one /the/ abuse of the word necessity. it is necessary to keep on foot this practice: for otherwise these subjects of ours would no longer be so. This we must not endure, so long as by any thing we can do we can retain them under our subjection; this would be an infraction of our Constitution: of that Constitution which every body has sworn to observe. [clxxii. 340] 1821 July 20 Rid Relinquishment honorable Slave Trade Sworn to observe? Oh yes: sworn to perform all and singular /this together with all the/ impossibilities which may be seen swarming in it. Look at Article 4. 'The nation is obliged to preserve and protect, by wise and just laws, the civil liberty and the property, besides all other legitimate rights, of all the individuals of which it is comprized.' What? all the Citizens? all that are its Citizens and no others? No: no such restriction does it contain: individuals is the word: not ciudadanos is the word. Now then the human beings whose skin is of a darker colour than your own - are they not individuals? When they cease to be individuals, then will you /your Representatives/ cease to have guaranteed their /to them/ civil liberty: then should any one say to you - you are tyrants not haters of tyranny, hypocrites not men of sincerity then will you be able to clear yourselves of the opprobrium /their /imputations/ reproaches/, and call them calumny, and call the authors of these calumniators. Slavery under you or any subjects /known subject/ of yours is it what you mean by this same civil liberty? /slavery such as that in which they keep those whom for that purpose they have purchased instead of cattle/ Well then go yourselves to Negro land, put yourselves under the power of those whom by such purchase you now get under yours - by that means /in that way/ you may secure to yourselves the blessing you thus denunciate and without the complication and embarrassment of Constitutional Codes made only to be violated or neglected. [clxxii. 341] 1821 July 20 Rid Relinquishment honorable Slave Trade Casting from you this leprosy /Having healed yourselves/ you would thus be that which so long as it cleaves to you you can not be - an object of respect as well as sympathy to the whole of the English nation and the honest part of the French and /but/ especially to the Anglo-American United States to that nation whose place in the seat of moral and intellectual worth it stands so high above both.. Spaniards /My friends/ why should I dissemble to /conceal from/ you those reproaches which so incessantly wound my ears - those reproaches in which it is said that had it not been for your nation and another which I can not bring my pen to trace this stain upon Christianity /the religion of yours/ /civilised society/ would years ago have been washed out. Such are the reproaches with which my ears are wounded: and what can I say /find/ to clear myself of them? tell me I beseech you what, for with all my affection for you with all partiality for your cause as often as this topic comes on the carpet so often am I mute. [clxxii. 342] 1821 July 20 Rid Relinquishment honorable Slave Trade Speaking of the French nation, I say the honest part: for it is but too true and sufficiently notorious that in that nation there are those who having made a vow to make slaves of their own countrymen regard with horror any proposition /measure/ the effect of which would be to set limits to the number of their slaves With you these men I am satisfied are no more in honour than with me. But on this [...?] subject whatsoever may be said against them on the score of barbarity /inhumanity/ and injustice, nothing can be said against them on the score of inconsistency and /or/ hypocrisy. They have not sworn as your Representatives by Articles 4 and 13 and your King has sworn to take for the end of their government the happiness of all the individuals belonging to the nation: they have not sworn to preserve civil liberty to all those individuals. In their eyes the proper end of government is - not the happiness of all, but the happiness of one, together with that of such few others, to whom in consideration of a certain mass of property which no matter by what means they have secured /contrived/ to get into their possession, it shall please him to let in for a share /loan/ suffer to enjoy at his expence /share with him/ a share in the means of happiness. And these same men - what /in their eyes/ are you yourselves in their eyes? A gang /land/ /nation/ of rebels and traitors and rebels whose blood flowing from a scaffold would to that of the vast majority of their fellow citizens be the most delightful of all spectacles to their eyes. Such are the men with whom so long as any part of Ultramaria is called yours you hold community of principle and affection and endeavour: but with this difference that what with exceptions too inconsiderable to be worth taking into account /mention/ they do but wish to be, you are. [clxxii. 343] 1821 July 20 Rid Relinquishment honorable Slave Trade Now then my friends if honour has any place /so it be that honour has/ in your wishes, there it is for you: there it is for you as soon as between you and the Slave-buying provinces the connection is dissolved. There it is for you and of the purest kind. Note well too that by so doing you will rid yourselves not only of the abomination of Slave-buying, but of the abomination of Slave-holding and by so doing you will thus in the scale of true honour place yourselves not only above the French nation not only above the English nation but above the Anglo-American nation. For with them /this young and virtuous nation/ though this least bad part of the double system is matter of regret and shame, it is still theirs: for with them that which /necessity/ in your mouths would be but pretence has for the present but too incontestable an existence, has still that hold which with honesty and sincerity they are continually employed in loosening to the utmost of their power. You would rid yourselves I say of Slave-holding or I can /will/ not suppose /I see no reason to suppose/ that is for your own use that you continue to do what you still do towards keeping up that practice. It is no part of your new scheme of good government to import Black men into Spain to serve as slaves in your own houses. But It is only because if you did not in breach of your Constitutional Code suffer them to keep Black men slaves in their houses /if you would not suffer them to treat others as slaves/ and on their lands they would not (you fear) behave to you as subjects - this is the cause and the only cause by which the connection you have with the system of tyranny is continued. [clxxii. 344] 1821 July 19 Omitted 9 Apr. 1822 Lett Conclusion? The Relinquishment [...?] Slave Trade Spaniards /Men of Spain/ Think not that by shutting his eyes, and giving the reins to passion, to self-tormenting no less than mischievous passion it is in the power of man to convert wrong into right, justice into injustice, cruelty into humanity, rashness into prudence, blindness into discernment, impossibility into accomplishment. Think not that by shutting his own a man can shut other eyes. Fancy not that any more than your own Don Quixote merely by shutting his eyes or driving spurs into his horse could any of you more effectually than Don Quixote did put to death a wind-mill or stop the sails of it in their course. Think /Fancy/ not that by anger on your part by anger passion intense and furious and inexerable the nature of things or the nature of man can be changed Talking and asking thus/ They think to raise themselves, in fact they sink themselves. Nonsense will not in Spanish any more than in French or English raise a man. For the moment perhaps, yes: but no sooner is the nonsense seen to be nonsense than that moment is at an end. The more you praise yourselves, not the more, but the less, will you be praised by others. Self-praise, be the quantity in which it is daubed on ever so unconscionable /enormous/ will not stick. Even in this accomplishment, think not that you do or can make yourselves stand foremost. We have those who can outdo you in it. We have been longer in the practice of it. Look at our Tories: look at our Whigs. See with what facility, honor, glory, splendour, dignity pass with us for reasons. For reasons for our holding our pockets open to be pillaged: for reason for hiring men, by hundreds of thousands, to kill others in equal multitudes multitudes none of whom ever gave them offence.
-
Title: [[clxii. 35] 1820. Aug. 14 Comments]Description: [clxii. 35] 1820. Aug. 14 Comments for the English translation Emancipation Spanish Summary Transfer to U.S. Give up all no half measures Sell to U.S. Now in this same limit - what every body knows - what you in particular can not but know - there is nothing new. Look to Louisiana there you see already a precedent. From the generosity of your own beloved Monarch Bonaparte obtains that fair country: he sells it to the United States - for these | | years it has formed part of Yankey-Land. Thus far we /you/ have a case in point as our lawyers phrase it: a precedent in point. Our own Lord Chancellor /Eldon/ could not find any thing to object to it on that score: our own Earl Grey would not pronounce it absurd, visionary and senseless our own Lord Erskine our own Lord John Russel would not pronounce it wild and visionary. our own House of Lords our own House of Lords according to whom so it have been but once done under the most corrupt of Constitutions whatsoever has been done is right our own House of Lords even though headed /led/ by a Lord Eldon. One condition however, if it depended upon me, I would venture as above to propose - and that a somewhat new one - namely that without the consent of a majority at least of the people whose fate /lot/ was thus disposed of, the bargain should not take place. Here indeed I should have all those illustrious /noble/ persons with all their ancestors upon my back: this would indeed be absurd, visionary and senseless; this would indeed be wild and visionary. Consult Erskine [...?] vituperation Against this I should find my friends of the Edinburgh Review, in the agony of despair not being able /unable/ to find so much as the shadow of an argument against it entering their protestation /saying all they could find to say against it and exclaiming in black and white We protest! saying thus against it all they could find to say against/ that protest which in the like agony they entered against the faculty of reading established in the character of a qualification for giving a vote: that qualification which in 1811 I proposed /ventured to propose/ in theory and which in 1812 and again in 1820 Your rulers (blessed be they for the honour done to an obscure old Englishman!) converted into practice Oh /Alas!/ where would /will/ Grandees be! where will Lords be - not forgetting their retainers, when the use of letters and the voting in the choice or removal of rulers were become faculties equally and universally diffused? Oh yes - the consent of the parties whose every thing is disposed of by it must be given to the treaty, or my signature can not be given to it.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1