1
results found in
30 ms
Page 1
of 1
1821. Jan y. 1 ' Revised 1822 March 20
Rid Yourselves of Ultramaria
Note
Introduction
'. 6. Tables - grounds of the opinion
Note (a) to Table 1.
(a) In this Table, under the head of Indian
Revenue, vast differences will be found between some periods and others. For
solution of the difficulty, the observation made by Townsend is that, when the amounts are so large it is the gross revenue that is given; when they are so small the net revenue. By net, what he seems to have meant
is - that part, which found its way into the treasury is
Spain: by gross, the whole of
what was collected in America and Spain together: the rest
being expended, in the countries in and from which it was collected. At the same
time, you have seen him insisting that " the Spanish Colonies
yield no direct revenue to the Mother Country": and the time, in relation to
which this is said, is little distant from the times, at which, if the above
supposition be correct, they are stated by him as yielding to the Mother Country
considerable sums: namely Reals vellon 39,899,918 on an average of 10 years ending
1778; and 60,000,000 reals vellon, on an average of 5 years, ending 1785. To
reconcile the general assertion with these articular accounts, we must suppose, that,
on the occasion of the general assertion, he took into consideration that part of the
expenditure of Spain which, being made in Spain on account of Spanish America, was
drawn from Spain: namely of the total expenditure of Spain in Spain, that part, which was bestowed upon such parts, of the Army,
Navy, Judicial and Financial establishments respectively the demand for which was
produced by the dominion exercised in Spanish America by the Spanish rulers. On this
supposition, the expenditure, in Spain on account of Spanish America, being deducted from the net amount of the receipt in Spain from Spanish
America,- the balance, according to his abovementioned general assertion, was
Similar Items
-
Title: [1820. Aug. 19 Rid Yourselves of Ultramaria]Description: 1820. Aug. 19 Rid Yourselves of Ultramaria Introduction is little distant from the times at which, if the above supposition be correct, they are stated by him as yielding to the Mother Country Reals Vellon 38,899,918 viz on an average of 10 years ending 1778: and 60,000,000 reals vellon, viz on an average of 5 years ending 1785. To reconcile the general assertion with the particular accounts, we must suppose that, on the occasion of the general assertion, he took into consideration the expenditure, which, being made in Spain on account of Spanish America, was drawn from Spain: namely, of the total expenditure of Spain in Spain, that part that was bestowed upon such part of the army, navy, financial department, and judicial establishment, the demand for which was produced by the dominion exercised in Spanish America by the Spanish rulers. 2. Table II, headed American Revenue Table A o. 1786 or thereabouts, as per Count de Grepi or Greppi Imperial Consul at Cadiz, will sufficiently explain itself. It is from Townsend, II, 181, 182, 412. 3. Table III headed Spanish Revenue and Expenditure Table A o 1820, or thereabouts, is copied from the Morning Chronicle of August 12th 1820: in which, the genuineness being supposed, it must have been a translation from some Spanish original: which, of course, rather than make a retranslation of this translation, and translator of this paper into Spanish will employ: applying to it at the same time all such corrections, explanations and observations, as it may be deemed to stand in need of. In conclusion, after some explanations, the total of the Expenditure is given, and the difference between the one and the other, i.e. the " Deficit" indicated. 4. Table IV. Spanish Expenditure. Table A o. 1778: from Townsend II. 187, 188, 2d Edit. In the original, the articles are not as here distributed into classes; and the order in which they follow one another is a little different from that in which they will be seen here exhibited. In this reprint, for the purpose of the present argument, they will be seen distributed into four classes. Class 1 is composed of such, the demand for which, upon the face of them, can not (it is supposed) have been, in any proportion, created by the dominion over Spanish America, or any other of the distant dependencies of Spain, or by the Monarchical form of the Government; Class 2, of these the demand for which, upon the face of them, can not, (it is supposed) have been created by the dominion in question, but had been, the whole of it, created by the Monarchical form of the Government; Class 3, of these, upon the face of them, the demand for which must, in some proportion or other have been (it is supposed) created by the dominion in question; Class 4, of a single article, which, upon the face of it, can not but have been in its totality, created by the dominion in question. (a).
-
Title: [1820. Dec r 30. Revised 1822 March 20]Description: 1820. Dec r 30. Revised 1822 March 20 Rid Yourselves of Ultramaria. Tables to the Introduction (d) by net amount seems to be here meant, what was considered as the net amount of the sums received in Spain, after deduction made of those expended in Ultramaria. But, to find the result in respect of profit and loss from the dominion over Ultramaria to Spain, against this so stiled net amount, must be set that part of the aggregate expence of Spain, which, but for the dominion, would not have had existence: and which it is supposed would not be found so little as twice the amount of this stiled net profit. See Table II. Table I. Conjunct Revenue Table Spanish ULtramarian including namely, Spanish and Spanish-America, at seven different periods Public Revenue of Spain: Exclusive of that called Indian Revenue, (b) according to Townsend's Journey through Spain 2 d. Edit. 1792. II. 184. 185, 186. 190 ed. Reals Vellon Pounds Sterling Public Revenue termed Indian Revenue according to Townsend. II 184, 185 2 d. Edit. Reals Vellon. Pounds Sterling (b.) In articles 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, the sums are the remainders after deducting from those in Townsend the sums mentioned in his Table as the amount of the Revenue, called Indians Revenue: those amounts are here brought together in the Table headed Indian Revenue. (c.) In the Table, in which this infomation is inserted, the year is 1774. This, however, must have been a mistake: for, in the particulars already given (II. 182.) of this same revenue, the years 1785 and 1786, are mentioned. (d.) By net amount.
-
Title: [[162- 120] 1820 June 4 Emancipation]Description: [162- 120] 1820 June 4 Emancipation Spanish '.5. People Sufferers Taking that same year for the standard, or /that is/ at any rate for the object of reference, /in the account of pecuniary[?] profit and loss in those days was/ such was then the loss by those distant possessions. Per contra, what shall we find to set against that loss - to set on the profit side, for the purpose of striking a balance? If we may believe that some intelligent, well-informed and [...?] searching and scrutinizing traveller, exactly nothing.......0 In Vol. II. p. 181. After speaking of five conjectural statements by two of which the direct revenue yielded to the mother country by the Spanish Colonies had been set down by one at 40,000,000, Reals vellon, (,400,000) by another /a third/ at 400,000,000 (,4,000,000) and by a fourth at 60,000,000 Reals vellon (,600,000) the two first stating the gross, the third the net amount, he proceeds thus. "The fact, however, is, if we may believe those who are the best informed, that the Spanish Colonies yield no direct revenue to the mother country. So decided is he in this persuasion, that in this subject he continues and concludes as follows. "This being the case, I can not conceive upon what authority, the Abbé Raynal states the clear revenue from America at thirty-four millions five hundred thousand livres, or, in reals vellon, at one hundred thirty-eight millions clear, besides eighty-two millions three hundred thirty-seven thousand eight hundred reals paid for duties in Europe."
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1