1820. Nov r 15. Revised 1822 March 18

Emancipation Spanish

'.6. J.B.'s Opinion 1792.

My friends, even in those days, I was not altogether unknown in

France, But anything more on this head would lead me too wide from the subject.

By this time you will have heard more or less of my work on Punishments and Rewards, edited in French by Dumont of Geneva first edition in

1802. In the volume on Rewards, is a chapter on Colonies. The matter of it was extracted from my

abovementioned pamphlet. The reasoning applies alike to all other countries holding

remote dependencies: England herself, as it will ere long be seen, forms no

exception.

In various works of other persons, it can not but be, that opinions

to this effect have incidentally been delivered: but I know not of any others, in

which, as applied to distant dependencies in general the question has ever been

argued in form, as in these of mine.

To return to Spain. If the product of the dominion was loss even in those days, what

would it be in these? If such was then the product of the

dominion, what is now the product of the claim?

Spaniards! the enquiry is now in your hands.
Similar Items
  • Title: [1820 Nov r 12 Rid Yourselves]
    Description: 1820 Nov r 12

    Rid Yourselves

    Introduction

    J.B.'s Opinion

    '.7. Jeremy Bentham's Opinion A o 1792 as applied to France and

    to distant dependencies in general.

    Permitt me to conclude with a more particular reference to my own opinion, as above

    spoken of, appplied as it was, in the only direct purpose of it, to the case of

    France. The work, in which the grounds of it are briefly developed, is a pamphlet of

    48 8vo. pages headed Jeremy Bentham to the National Convention of France:

    better characterized by the three words of exhortation that occur in the first

    sentence - Emanciapte Your Colonies. It was printed in

    January 1793: it has incidentally found its way into various hands; but has not ever

    yet been exposed to sale. A copy is ere this, at the disposal of the Cortes, if

    honoured by their acceptance: a few other copies are at Madrid in private hands.

    My friends, even in those days I was not altogether unknown in the country to which

    on that occasion I was addressing myself. But any thing more on this head would lead

    me too wide from the subject.

    But this time you will have heard more or less of my work on Punishments and Rewards, edited in French by Mr. Dumont of Geneva. In the Volume on Rewards is a Chapter on Colonies.

    The matter of it was extracted from my above mentioned pamphlet. The reasoning

    applies alike to all other countries holding remote dependencies: England not

    excepted.

    In various works of other persons, it can not but be that opinions to this effect

    have incidentally been delivered: but I know not of any other in which the question

    has ever been argued in form as in these of mine.

    To return to Spain. If the product of the dominion in question was loss even in

    those days, what would it be in these? - Spaniards! the inquiry is now fully in your

    hands.
  • Title: [1820 Dec 30 copied Revised 1822 March 18]
    Description: 1820 Dec 30 copied Revised 1822 March 18

    Introduction

    '. 6. J.B.'s Opinion 1792

    ' Jeremy Bentham's Opinion, with Reasons, as applied to

    France, and distant dependencies in general, A o 1792.

    I conclude this Introduction with a more particular reference to my

    own opinion, as above spoken of, applied as it was in the only direct purpose of it,

    to the case of France.

    The work, in which the grounds of it are briefly developed, is a

    pamphlet of 48 8 vo pages, headed Jeremy

    Bentham to the National Convention of France.

    Better would it have been characterized by the three words of exhortation that occur

    in the first sentence - Emancipate your Colonies. It was

    printed in the last month of 1792 or the first of 1793: it has incidentally found its

    way into various hands: but has scarcely ever been exposed to sale. A copy of it was,

    along with others of my works presented to the late Cortes, by which the same regard

    was paid to it as to your liberties and your welfare. Among the representatives of

    your neighbours, those words such as they are, have not been alike unfortunate.

    My
  • Title: [1820. Dec r 30. Revised 1822 March 20]
    Description: 1820. Dec r 30. Revised 1822 March 20

    Rid Yourselves of Ultramaria. Tables to the Introduction

    (d) by net amount seems to be here meant,

    what was considered as the net amount of the sums received in Spain, after deduction

    made of those expended in Ultramaria. But, to find the result in respect of profit

    and loss from the dominion over Ultramaria to Spain, against this so stiled net amount, must be set that part of the aggregate expence

    of Spain, which, but for the dominion, would not have had existence: and which it is

    supposed would not be found so little as twice the amount of this stiled net profit.

    See Table II.

    Table I. Conjunct Revenue Table Spanish ULtramarian including namely,

    Spanish and Spanish-America, at seven different periods

    Public Revenue of Spain: Exclusive of that called Indian Revenue, (b) according to Townsend's Journey

    through Spain 2 d. Edit. 1792. II. 184. 185, 186. 190 ed.

    Reals Vellon

    Pounds Sterling

    Public Revenue termed Indian Revenue

    according to Townsend. II 184, 185 2 d. Edit.

    Reals Vellon.

    Pounds Sterling

    (b.) In articles 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, the sums are the remainders after

    deducting from those in Townsend the sums mentioned in his Table as the amount of the

    Revenue, called Indians Revenue: those amounts are here

    brought together in the Table headed Indian Revenue.

    (c.) In the Table, in which this infomation is inserted, the year is

    1774. This, however, must have been a mistake: for, in the particulars already given

    (II. 182.) of this same revenue, the years 1785 and 1786, are mentioned.

    (d.) By net amount.