date

Editorial marks in red ink by J. Mill?
Editorial marks in red ink by J. Mill?

2 Jan 1809

Evid. Prosp. View

B II Theoretic

Ch. Foundation

Innate Propensity

(1)

Innate propensity to sin: therefore sinning is reasonable

Not to be inserted

The mode of reasoning employed by these partizans (if the application of the word reason or any of its conjugates may be on this occasion be be endured is truly curious.

When the supposed fact is of the number of those which are seen by every body to be happening every day, reasons for regarding the report as false are admitted by them without difficulty. But when the supposed fact is of the number of those which are never seen to happen—which no human being that lives will so much as pretend to have seen happen, then it is that all objections to the report are to stand back all reasons for regarding the report as false are to be turned aside from with abhorrence. Then it is that this all proving argument is to be brought forward—there exists in man an innate propensity to believe whatever he hears reported as true, therefore the supposed facts supposed on this occasions to have been reported, these facts, be they ever so improbable, are to be received as true.

In a word where a fact is probable it may be disbelieved but if to a certain degree it be improbable, this is the sort of fact that must be believed.

The innate propensity to believe all things, is not brought forward to obtain evidence for probable facts: no: facts must to a certain degree be improbable, to entitle themselves to the benefit of it.

So long as any observations can be found, that present a chance of causing the facts in dispute to be received into the class of probable ones, the arguments are made the most of—the probability of the facts is maintained—and every circumstance by which the probability is regarded as diminished, is either anxiously stripped off or candidly given up. No assistance is then sought from the innate propensity to believe all things. But when the improbability [is]determined to be too flagrant to be denied, then it is that the innate propensity is called in to do its office, and the [...?] are openly avowed, that where you have not the reporter to cross-examine the improbability of his report can afford us sufficient reason for disblieving it.
Similar Items
  • Title: [Marginal summary and editorial marks by J]
    Description: Marginal summary and editorial marks by J. Mill.

    2 Nov r 1806

    Evidence

    Circumstantial

    Ch [...?] Phys

    § Price

    4

    What on this occasion I can not help suspecting is that in the statement of this case one circumstance or condition, and that an essential one, has been left out:—viz: that of the several MS alt. ‘disjunctive’ chosen by J. Mill. facts each of which is in the degree in question improbable, the existence of one or other is a fact so far from [im] ‘improbable’ J. Mill correction.probable as to be altogether certain. For this certainty though [...?] seems to be implicitly and necessarily involved in the conception of the case. In strictness of speech no conceivable event is certain, just before any and every drawing, the tickets may be burnt, the boy that should have drawn them may drop down dead or run away: the hall in which they should have been drawn may be swallowed up by an earthquake. But these and all other such contingencies are laid out of the case: and so are all others by which the drawing of the lottery in the ordinary course could have been defeated. Certainly then as that explained being assumed, as it can not but be, what is certain is that of these 50,000 tickets some one will be first drawn: and the chances against each being the same, that it should prove to be the first drawn [is] ‘is’ J. Mill addition. it is just as likely of each one as of every other. That in the case of any one of them there should be an improbability I would not take upon me to deny: whether the term be proper or no, depends upon usage: and in this case the usage seems to be fixed: fixed and by the cultivators of science, by those who have the best chance to the privilege of fixing it. But as to incredibility, I would venture to ask whether a fact of this description be in any the smallest degree incredible: the fact altogether incredible would be that as one ticket of the whole 50,000 should be the first drawn: and of each one, that it should have been the first drawn it is exactly as credible as of every other.

    6

    Leaving aside all consideration as to practical drawing of y e lottery, equally probable & credible y t any one partar ticket sh d be drawn first at y t any other sh d
  • Title: [Headings and some notes in text by Bentham]
    Description: Headings and some notes in text by Bentham, text in the hand of Colls.

    1821 March 3

    Jug. Util and True

    10

    Plan of the Work

    Part III. Revealed at large. Verity considered.

    10

     Here copy the titles of the Chapters. Note by Bentham in red ink.

    Part III.

    On the usefulness of Supposed Revealed Religion at large—verity considered.

    Ch.1.

    Notion that belief is the only safe course, and that therefore a deaf ear should be turned to all disprobative arguments: its absurdity and fallaciousness exposed.

    Ch.2.

    The facts assumed are, in all supposed Revealed Religions, destitute of all support from trustworthy evidence: the falsity of the statement is always more probable than the verity of it. No judicial decision would be regarded as warranted by such evidence.

    Ch.3.

    Supposed proof from miracles—its improbativeness. Witnesses, none: miracle non: nothing but the report of one.

    Ch.4.

    Supposed proof from predictions—its disprobativeness.

    §.1. Predictions, supposed preternatural, classed.

    §.2. Relation between supposed supernatural predictions, and other miracles.

    Ch.5.

    D r. Campbel's answer. Belief is the work of sense. Sense being infallible, belief proves the truth of everything believed—the absurdity exposed.

    Ch.6.

    D r. Price's answer to the objection of improbability—improbabilities are continually happening—the fallacy exposed.

    Ch.7.

    Propensity to believe improbable things—its causes natural and factitous

    §.1. Man at large—why credulous—credulous in proportion to their ignorance /ignorance the cause and measure of credulity/

    §.2. Medical men—why incredulous.

    §.3. Factitious, or less immediate causes—Priestcraft—groundless fear, from invisible sources, employed as an instrument of dominion. See Part II. Ch.8.
  • Title: [2 Jan 1809 Evid. Prosp. View]
    Description: 2 Jan 1809

    Evid. Prosp. View

    B.II Theoretic

    Ch. Foundation

    Innate Propensity

    (2)

    Against a man armed with this argument what avail all the powers of reasoning? The utmost they can pretend to is to shew the fact to be improbable: and when this is done, if the argument be admitted for any thing nothing is done. The fact is improbable: admitted but somebody or other is said to have related it: and therefore as there exists in us an innate propensity to believe whatever we hear reported probable or improbable, your objections [...?] to nothing, it ought to be and must be believed.