3 April 1815

Jug. True

Ch.3. Natural Evidence

8

Although the fact should by supposition really have taken place, yet to produce in proof of it evidence of this best character, evidence from unimpeachably trustworthy sources in sufficient number and in the most trustworthy stamp is not always in the power of man and thence it is that of several sorts of facts there are in proof of which evidence inferior in its degree of trustworthiness is received, and produces its effect. But, to produce such best evidence never can without self-contradiction in terms be said to be [...?] of the power of omnipotence.

In the minds of persons who in relation to a multitude of alledged miracles supposing them performed must have been percipient witnesses, the perceptions thus obtained are in the histories in question stated as not having produced a persuasion in assurance of the declaration by which Jesus so repeatedly stated himself as acting by commission from the Almighty. In the minds of persons stated as having been, and that over and over again been percipient witnesses in relation to facts of the character in question to those supernatural and divine commission proving facts: and yet with this counter-proof before us, are we this time of day called upon to give credence to the mere reports of those same facts, reports destitute of all those securities for correctness and compleatness which in proof of facts of this most ordinary character and continual recurrence are regarded and held as necessary to afford a just ground for credence.
Similar Items
  • Title: [4 Oct. 1815 Jug. True Ch. Imperfections]
    Description: 4 Oct. 1815

    Jug. True

    Ch. Imperfections

    3

    §. Length of time

    4. The longer the interval in question, the longer the time during which, the greater the probability that during that time in the place of or in addition to such reports as may or might have been furnished by percipient witnesses themselves, or by witnesses removed by a less number of removes or degrees from the seat of perception, reports from witnesses removed from that same standard by a greater number of removes or degrees.

    5. The longer the interval, the greater the length of time in the course of which death or other accidents or changes may have removed out of the way any given number of those who having received information to whose knowledge such facts have presented themselves or enabled them to expose and rectify any such incorrect or deceptively incompleat representations or statements in relation to the matter in question may have been made.

    The longer the interval the more time there is for any or all such persons to go off as if they had remained would by their knowledge of relevant facts have been in a way to rectify any misrepresentation of erroneous reports which the matter in question may have been the subject.

    Let the interval be of a certain length, the time of those persons will have expired: and when once the stage is thus cleared, misrepresentation has full swing, and circumstantial evidence or self-contradiction on the part of the witnesses whose testimony constitutes the mass of direct evident self-contradiction or mutual contradiction remain the sole sources from which any correction to the misrepresentation or recourse against deception can be deduced.

    5.

    4. Chance of remoteness by extinction of percipient witnesses and intermediate reporting witnesses of degrees near to the percipient and first reporting witness.

    6.

    5. Chance of extinction of those by whom correction might have been administered to reports of percipient and intermediate reporting witnesses.

    7.

    At the end of a certain interval, all such chance being at an end, misrepresentation by reporting witnesses of all sorts has full sway: sole chance of correction then is by self-contradiction or mutual contradiction on their parts.
  • Title: [21 Jan y 1814 C? Jug. Util [...?]]
    Description: 21 Jan y 1814 C?

    Jug. Util [...?] Inferendum?

    Ch.3. Natural Evidence

    3

    (1)

    Ch. or §. Untrustworthiness of the Natural branch of the probative Evidence, in respect of the Shapes in which it (now) presents itself (to us).

    In the present state of society by those who with any expectation of permanent success having narratives to deliver, call upon the public for credence certain precautions are constantly observed.

    1. Time and place individualized.

    2. Percipient witnesses particularized.

    3. Of as many of them as may be, the [...?] in token of attestation, obtained.

    4. As well as the character of percipient and deposing witnesses as in the character of persons committing to writing or having delivered and attesting the authenticity of those same depositions, the sort of persons regarded as most trustworthy and most effectually made known as such MS alt. illegible. whether by official or any other situation, taken and employed in preference.

     Explain a little further these 4 heads or some of them?
  • Title: [7 Aug. 1815 : rework this 14 Aug.]
    Description: 7 Aug. 1815 : rework this 14 Aug.

    Jug. True

    Ch. Imperfections

    1

    §. Marks of Verity

    (4) (1)

    Modes of verity—give the use of all or each

    1. Individualization as to time

    2. D o as to Place Time 1. abridged 2. relative

    4. 3. Individuals present

    7. 4. Narrating witness whether percipient or no

    6. 5. If not, who the intermediate reporting witnesses and the number of resources

    5. 6. Narrative when penned—how soon after the supposed fact

    7. 1. No self contradiction /[...?] Negative marks/

    7. And who of other narratives either actual or possible and whether trustworthy or untrustworthy; and why

    2. No mutual contradictions.

    To possess any reasonable claim to credence a statement or narrative to the penning of which supernatural assistance under the name of imposition or any other name purports upon the face of it or is alledged to have been afforded, ought to wear upon the face of it all such marks of verity, internal or external, as human wisdom has ever been known to afford, viz. if not all such as at the present time that wisdom is able and has been known to afford, at any rate and at the least all such as at the time in question human wisdom was able, and has been known to afford.

    [marginal note]

    Aphorism respecting title to credence as far as regards the employing the known evidence of trustworthiness.