date

1821 March 2. Jug. Util and True
1821 March 2.

Jug. Util and True

9

Plan of the Work

Part III. Revealed Verity apart

9

III. In Part the third, the question of usefulness in the present life having been examined by arguments that apply at the same time to Natural and to supposed Revealed Religion, the question of verity is now considered: not now apparent, but real verity. But in this Part it is considered in the most general and abstract point of view, abstraction made of all supposed /particular/ revealed religion in general and the supposed revealed religion of Jesus in particular: but at the same time by arguments the tendency of which is to disprove the existence of all such imagined as well as all other imaginable revelation in the [...?]: applying to all of them alike.

This part is indeed compleatly at issue with the advocates of the religion of Jesus: and by it the whole of the ground they maintain is attacked, and in case of success taken from them. But still nothing is done to produce that peculiar irritation which an attack directed against an individual object of reverence individually and separately considered, can not but excite. The hold he possessed on their affections is by this means more or less weakened, antecedently to the period at which the direct, individual, direct, and in the highest degree irritative, attack is made.

On this occasion, all other supposed Revealed Religions being comprized in the attack, that which has Religion reprisals to him as false, as well as those which it represents to him as true—the religion of Mahomet and that of Bramah for example, as well as that of Jesus and that of Moses—by this circumstance likewise will the irritation be naturally diminished. As the attack proceeds, he may /to the last continue/ for a greater or less length of time continuing indulging himself in the hope that while all other religions are simultaneously or successively laid prostrate, his own may by its peculiar excellence be preserved to the end of the engagement from the destructive fire. In the mean time the force of reason and the habit /practice/ of applying attention[?] to it has /found entrance into/ gained possession of his mind.
Similar Items
  • Title: [1821 Oct. 14. Jug. Util. Plan]
    Description: 1821 Oct. 14.

    Jug. Util.

    Plan of Procedure

    Rule 4. (For the avoidance of irritation) make use upon occasion of this parenthesis—Revelation apart. This caution was observed and frequently employed in Bentham Introduction to Morals and Legislation L n 1789.

    Rule 5. (For avoidance of irritation) In the attack on supposed Revealed Religion, commence with supposed Revealed Religion considered in all its shapes. The argument will thus be much less irritative than if pointed in the first instance against the supposed Revealed Religion of Jesus.
  • Title: [1821 Oct. 14 Jug Util 2]
    Description: 1821 Oct. 14

    Jug Util

    2

    Plan of Procedure

    2

    Rule 3. Take Natural Religion for the object of the first attack: leaving Revealed Religion, as carefully as possible unassailed. See Bentham to Jean Baptiste Say, 4 August 1823, Letter 2988, The Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, Volume 11. Bring to view in every occasion the alliance between the opinion here advocated and those of Revealed Religionists: in particular those of the English Establishment.

    On the occasion of the attack on Natural Religion the question as to Usefulness and the question as to Verity will be found considerably entangled: to extricate them from this entanglement considerable care will be necessary.

    In regard to Natural Religion, so far as concerns Verity actual want of Verity must not be imputed to it; for in that case the attack would reach supposed Revealed Religion: want of apparent verity is all that must be imputed to it: viz: from the want of sufficient evidence: of the sufficient evidence which Revealed Religion is supposed to have furnished.

    So far as regards Usefulness, the first point to prove is the negative point—namely the want of positive usefulness. On this occasion the argument is more at liberty, than when the positive mischievousness is brought to view. For here, as in the case of the question of verity, the deficiency tells in favour of supposed Revealed Religion: whereas when you come to speak of positive mischievousness, it is not without difficulty that you will be able to keep the attack clear of supposed Revealed Religion. In addition to the fears inseparable from it, the positive mischiefs will consist chiefly of the mischiefs produced by all confessed false Religions, and those produced by the misconception and misapplication of the alledged only true one.
  • Title: [1821 March.2. Jug. Util and True]
    Description: 1821 March.2.

    Jug. Util and True

    11

    Plan of the Work

    Part IV. Christianity—Verity considered.

    11

    IV. In Part the fourth, the religion of Jesus is the individual—supposed religion to which the examination is confined. On this occasion the precedence is given to the question of verity, before the question of usefulness. / If this is done, give the reasons: viz. it being less irritative than the display of the mischievousness, while the Verity remains unimpeached /unconfuted./ This parenthetic note is in red ink. Of this priority, the reason is—that, in case of any particle of belief still remaining, the display of the mischievousness of the doctrines attributed to Jesus could scarce fail of being productive of a correspondent degree of irritation, which in the case of the utter extirpation of the belief would have no place.

    Still in this part, the point of view in which the question of verity is considered is but general: the arguments against it being such as require not the entering into details. By this means likewise matter of irritation /for the present discarded /omitted// in particular more especially affecting his person and character left to be displayed in another part in their full colours.

    To this part belongs the Chapters, of which the following are the titles. In each of them proof is given of some general proposition tending to remove the supposition of any supernatural character or commission from any supernatural power in the case of Jesus.

     This note in red ink.In the next leaf copy these titles.