date

1 Sept 1811 Jug Util + B.II
1 Sept 1811

Jug Util

+ B.II. Ch. 2 A

B.II.

Ch.3. Mischief. 5. Weakning Natural

1

Repentance

Ch.3. Mischief 1.

Ch.3. Lessening the mischief-prevailing /[.../ efficiency of Natural Religion—viz. by the doctrine of the efficacy of repentance.

According to the /plan of/ /In conformity to a distinction/ division familiar to Christian readers the duty of man towards man is divided into his duty to himself, and his duty to others.

We have seen /in/ what manner Christianity ([...?] be it always understood /remembered/ according to the prevailing interpretation of it) provides for the fulfilment of that branch /his self-regarding duty/ of mans duty which regards himself: let us now see the sort of provision it makes for the fulfilment of that /his extra-regarding duty/ which regard his duty to others.

We have seen how inefficient, with or without the support /from/ of Revelation, religion is in /when/ applied to the production of good or the prevention of evil. Efficient in appearance when its action is /operation and influence are/ confounded with that of the earth bred sanctions: nerveless and inefficient in reality, when on a clear scrutiny it has been discovered operating, or rather endeavouring /striving/ to operate of itself

1.

Mischief 5. Lessening the beneficial efficacy the influence of Natural Religion.

Man's duty to man viz. 1. to self. 2. to others. For provision made by Christianity respecting duty to self see above: now as to d o to others:

2.

Inefficiency of religious sanction revelation seen above: conjoined with the others efficient in appearance because they are in reality unsupported by them inefficient and seen to be so.
Similar Items
  • Title: [Heading by Bentham, text in another hand]
    Description: Heading by Bentham, text in another hand.

    Sept. 1811

    Jug. Util. B.II. Under Revelation. Ch.3. Mischief I. Lessening efficiency of Nat. Religion. viz. by Doctrine of Repentance

    1

    Part V. Verity apart

    1.

    6.

    12.
  • Title: [31 August 1814 [...?] Jug. Util.]
    Description: 31 August 1814 [...?]

    Jug. Util.

    B.II. Under Revelation

    Ch.4. Mischief 4. Forcing Pain.

    1

    Duty or merit make no difference when the effect is produced sole difference the extent of the effect.

     Look out for [...?] is designed exemplification.

    Ch.4. Mischief 4th /or 3rd/ Forcing man to embrace pain /compelling/ /[...?] men/ /self-torment/

    The notion by which in the shape in which it is productive of positive pain self-torment is constituted matter of merit or of duty does not in any part of the geographical field of Christianity /Christian dominion/ appear to be much in fashion. Under Protestantism it has never been. Under Catholicism it has ceased to be.

    To submitt to physical pain rather than be accessory /contributory/ to the production of psychological evil—moral or religious, and thence for the sake of avoiding and preventing so much of and in that shape, yes: but not simply and for its own sake. Not for the /clearer/ hope of recommending ones self to the favour of an infinitely benevolent as well as omnipotent being, and thus at the expense and endurable degree of pain producing in a chance of an exemption from unendurable ones.

    Pains of martyrdom, yes. In the voluntary acceptance and thus for self-infliction of pain on those occasions there was whether fulfillment duty or no there was more than fulfillment of duty than was merit. But on those occasions pain was courted /embraced/ not for its own sake, but /in the character of/ as a means leading towards an ulterior end: the saving a man from the obligation of abjuring /the doctrine of Jesus/ Christianity or the hope /endeavour/ to give extent to it: the saving a man's self from acts of disobedience towards God, or the [...?] of other men within the pale of his obedience.

    1.

    Mischief 3. Forcing man to embrace pain. The notion that self-torment is matter of duty or merit seems pretty much out of date, under Protestantism always, under Catholicism now.

    2.

    To submitt to physical evil rather than be accessory to merit or religion; yes in this there may be merit: but not in taking it upon man's self for its own sake not thereby to please a being of infinite benevolence.

    3.

    Pains of martyrdom yes. But martyrdom is a means to an end viz either saving one self from abjuring what is thought religious truth, or causing others to embrace it.
  • Title: [2 Sept 1811 Jug Util B.II.]
    Description: 2 Sept 1811

    Jug Util

    B.II. Under Revelation

    Ch.5. Mischief. Weakning Natural

    7

    Merit consisting in repentance in the pain of repentance, (1) /the/ an occasion for repentance was to be made. That this merit might not be effaced by ordinary sins or the indifferent transitions of ordinary life, (2) the [...?] of the meritorious person was to be closed by it it was to fill up /the last act and/ the last scene of life. What then was the means to /be/ chosen for bringing life to /its close/ a termination at the exactly proper period. (3) A man was not to die /by/ with his own hand: that would have been suicide, suicide a crime and a sin that admitts of no repentance /atonement/, suicide the sin against the Holy Ghost excepted, the most unatoneable and most /unpardonable/ irremissionible of all sins. It was therefore to be the hand of another. (4) But what other hand so attainable, and at the same time so apt as that of the executioner of public justice? This was not suicide: no more than Jesus's death. Attainable? but by what means? (5) There was but one, and that was the comitting a crime, the /co-operating in the/ punishing of which would thus become a part of his public duty. (6) /What remained was/ There remained nothing but the /making/ choice of the crime: and in this choice the same religious and christian spirit by which the idea had been suggested still manifested itself /bore away/. A crime was thought of by which crime as it was more good than evil /would/ was to be done, since /the salvation of a soul/ the securing of a [...?] soul against all perils of damnation would be the fruit of it.

    16

    1. Make an occasion for repentance.

    2. Choose the close of life repentance will then not be obliterated by first offences.

    3. Close not life by your own hand: that excludes repentance. (hence suicide worst of sins, sin against Holy Ghost excepted)

    4. Executioners the [...?] other hand at command.

    5. means committing a capital crime.

    6. Which that Christianity more good than evil may be done by it. should be infanticide age earlier than that of sin.