1
results found in
1841 ms
Page 1
of 1
10 Sept 1811
Jug Util
8
B.II. Under Revelation
Ch.
8
Vitiating Conceptions
II. Exaggeration
Jesus's precepts.
(7)
Consider in another point of view this same precept we shall find it at any rate much less dangerous, much more purely if not extremely useful, in the character of a rule of prudence: and if benevolence be a virtue, /neither is/ prudence excluded from the catalogue of the virtues.
But it is not in any such characters (that it is there presented) that it is even spoken of as presented by Jesus.
In your dealings with another man, think how you yourself would on the occasion in question like to be dealt with, whether in your own place /situation/ or in his in so far as by a stretch of the imagination it may be in your power to put /place/ yourself in his.
This only, though not without the requisite allowance for differences of feeling as resulting from differences in situation, will serve you /help/ /be of assistance in you/ in /determining/ your endeavours to determine whether and in what degree the mode of conduct which in the first impulse it occurs to you to observe towards him the effect would be likely to produce on his part uneasiness or satisfaction and thence as towards yourself goodwill or displeasure.
18.
Rule of prudence an undangerous and more extensively useful character in which unlimited rule of benevolence might be, but is not, applied. Prudence a virtue as well as benevolence. On such occasions to avoid ill will and ill offices and imitate good will and good offices think what in the event of your doing or not doing what you propose would in his situation be your own feelings.
19.
So far as due allowance is made for difference of feeling probably produced by difference of situation, this not merely the best but the only recourse for forming a right judgment on the question whether of the /act/ proposed the result will be in his part uneasiness or satisfaction, and as towards yourself good will and eventual good offices or ill will and correspondent offices.
Similar Items
-
Title: [[xxxvi. 106] 1822 July 1. Constitut]Description: [xxxvi. 106] 1822 July 1. Constitut Code Supreme Operative I. Monarch 1. Morals Lords veto Aristocratical Section of Public Opinion Tribunal paralysing democratic do. Not merely in the exercise of his political power - not merely in the public part of his life, but in the private part of his life, the natural tendency not to say the constant effect of his situation is to place it not at the top but at the bottom of the scale of moral worth, and this whether the influence of the self-regarding principle or that of the purely social principle namely sympathy - be considered. By the purely self-regarding principle the more urgent the need a man feels himself to have of the kindness and free good will of others, the more anxious /strenuous/ and steady will be his exertion for the obtaining it: the less the need the less strenuous The kindness and free good will and thence upon /as/ occasion /calls/ the good offices the services of others are in so far as /where/ power of remuneration is wanting no otherwise to be obtained than by demonstration of the like kindness, in effect and in endeavour a man's own part as towards them: the stronger a mans need of the effective benevolence of others the stronger the inducement he has for the manifesting effective benevolence as towards them: an inducement which in this way self-regarding prudence is sufficient /suffices/ to afford: the less the need, the less strong the inducement. But the Monarch is of all men the man who by a vast amount has least need of kindness and free good will and free good offices and free services at the hands of others - of the fruits of effective benevolence unmixt with those of self-regarding prudence. For whatsoever good things it be that in other situations men are indebted for to effective benevolence, it is in his power to command partly /in part/ by his punitive force /power/, in other part by remuneration. So the more extensively a man feels himself exposed to ill treatment at the hands of others, the stronger is the inducement he has to bestow upon them good treatment upon them, for the purpose of averting from him the effects of such their ill-will: the less extensive the exposure, the less the inducement. But the Monarch is of all men the one who stands the least extensively exposed to ill treatment at the hands of others: he is in a more especially degree protected /guarded/ against it by his /the/ punitive /branch of his/ power, and again by the remunerative, the /[...?] of the/ assistance and support considered which in the way of purchase, and without need of kindness on their part, it puts him in a condition to command on every occasion at the hands of others.
-
Title: [2 Sept 1811 Jug. Util B.II]Description: 2 Sept 1811 Jug. Util B.II. Ch. 6 7 8 Mischief. 5. Antipathy for pleasure ยง.1. Generalia 1 Ch. 6 8. Mischief 5. Producing antipathy towards others, for in the /partaking/ score of innoxuous pleasure act renamed antipathy from asceticism. In the present life the happiness and unhappiness /felicity and infelicity/ of human beings depends in a large proportion on their /the [...?]/ affections and disposition and conduct /as towards /relation to/ one another/ (of such portion of the entire species as come within the sphere of one anothers influence, on the external /exterior/ conduct, and hence in the inward affection in which that conduct has its use: in good offices /or/ and ill offices, and thence in good will and ill will. To promote in the breast of each man good will to all men is among the objects professed to be aimed at by them or some of them in whose discourses the Christian religion took its rise. But if such were the end aimed at, far from being conducive to that end have been some of the doctrines /affections/ that were soon embraced by and still continue to be prevalent among their followers. Exactly opposite to the affection /termed/ of good will is the affection /termed/ of ill-will or antipathy. With the exception therefore of the case in which ill-will /or rather ill-office/ towards one person or persons is necessary to the preservation of another, whatsoever opinion tends to exist and produce antipathy, tends in the same proportion to produce mischief in that shape. 1. Mischief.5. Producing antipathy from asceticism. Felicity or infelicity depends greatly on good and ill offices, thence on good and ill will. 2. To promote good will is among the professions of the author of Christianity: to promote ill will is the tendency of many of their doctrines. Promotion of ill will is every thing that tends to excite antipathy.
-
Title: [1822 April 1. Rid Yourselves Lett]Description: 1822 April 1. Rid Yourselves Lett. Relinquishment mode II Sale to Foreigners Trust to U.S. Everything in the way of advice Nothing in the way of force No, not even in the way of treaty: for treaty has force at the back of it. My friends, the more you know of the people of these United States - I mean more particularly of the conduct of the rulers on all public occasions - the more close /less reserved/ is the confidence you will repose in them. Look to their conduct as to all other nations. Look at their conduct as towards one another. You will find /may see/ it recorded in the book of their laws: in particular on the occasion of the cessions of territory from State to State. Look at their conduct as towards yourselves as towards your own rulers: your rulers under the old government: that government, which in its conduct towards other nations was of course not less flagitious than in its conduct as towards its own subjects. Look to the course of injury which for little less than twenty years the United States people and rulers continued for its extraordinarily protracted length of time in power to be enduring at their hands: think of the patience and forbearance /the long suffering/ manifested towards you all that time, think of your weakness, and examine /think/ whether any advantage was taken of that weakness. My friends you have a plain letter, a plain rule to go by. Those rulers who deal well by their own countrymen deal in the same manner with other men: those who deal ill by their own countrymen do so in like manner by other men. You know that the government is in check the men who rule all others are the best ones that can be found. You know that other /another/ Government in which the men who rule all others were the worst ones that could have been found: and where if they did rule [...?] so bad about their situation could have suffered to render so.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1