8 June 1804

Procedure Evidence

Ch Investigat?

§.6 Order - Rules.

§6. Order of investigation, direct and retrograde, through a chain of hearsay evidence.

Rule 1. In a chain of hearsay evidence, containing a number of intermediate links, consisting of the supposed statements of so many intermediate supposed reporting witnesses, interposed between the deposing and the supposed percipient or other immediate extra-judicial witness, on receiving indication, as above, of the supposed purport on the statement of the supposed percipient or immediate extra-judicial witness, the witness to be resorted to and convinced in the next instance is such supposed immediate witness.

Reason - By the convention and examination of the several intermediate witnesses, so much collateral inconvenience vexation, expense and delay will of course be produced. All which will, in case the supposed percipient or immediate witness has any evidence to give on the subject, be unnecessary and useless.

Rule 2. But if, on being examined, the supposed immediate witness denies all knowledge of the transaction, or gives /yields/ such testimony as is irreconciliable with the statement supposed to have been given in relation to his supposed extra-judicial statement, by the intermediate witness, by whom it is supposed to have been heard, in such case it may be proper and necessary to convene such intermediate witness of the first remove with the /such/ supposed immediate witness, whether for the purpose of contradicting and refuting the supposed immediate witness or assisting and correcting his recollections.

Reason. In this case, this step in the investigation becomes as plainly necessary, as it was seen to be unnecessary in the former case.