1
results found in
1 ms
Page 1
of 1
29 Dec r 1806
Scotch Reform
To L d Grenville
Omissa
Representations
And who are these tyros in judicature, these perpetual novices, who in the eyes of the learned founders of the system no experience can qualify for /enable to/ for pronouncing a judgment that shall be fit for being abided by?... My Lord, they are themselves, each and every one of themselves. And these are the men by whom whatsoever is done in the whole country in the name of justice was to be perpetually /at any time /received[?]/, modified, "advocated, suspended."
In[?] how everything in jurisprudence is governed by name and usage /always [...?] fit bad usage/, and how alone Utility and Reason have ever been to /found themselves on/ this ground. Call a man a Juryman, let him [...?] have set his foot in a court before, he becomes infallible: whatsoever else may be allowed to change his opinion for him, he himself never is. Call him a Lord of Session, calling the Lord of session at the same time, a Lord Ordinary, he never knows his own mind for two days together: he is incapable of forming the /any/ opinion that is fit to g for one: and this is what men get by buying in a stock of what by courtesy and misnomer is called learning:- by compleating or doubling[?] the vigenta[?] annuum[?] lunabratanis[?]. But the shuttings[?] give plainness and clearness to these as well as to all other[...?...?].
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1