1
results found in
1 ms
Page 1
of 1
29 July 1806
Evidence │ │ Scotch Reform
Facienda
Jury
No Jury at first
Appeal to Jury
In considering to this purpose the constitution of a Jury I mean to view it to the best advantage. I consider it accordingly as pure /clear/ from those superstitions and abominations with which in England /by the barbarian ancestors of Englishmen/ it has been defiled, and from in Scotland it is free. Your illustrious father my Lord, when he pleasured[?] a jury he did not employ torture to force them to committ perjury. He did not subjugate the impartial to the inflamed or the corrupt or violent, the infirm to the robust: he did not lodge the power of the whole in the hands of the most obstinate. As little do they in Scotland now where they make use of Juries, a majority decides, and to ensure a majority they provide an uneven number. No superstitious adherence to number 12. From 9 to 12 or 13 are the numbers proposed by Lord [...?] for his Juries
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1