24 June 1811 June 24 1

ad Juperbriam

Fallacies 2 Ch. 2 Posterity Chainers

Sole and thus proper, these taken for the security of the [...?] Langdon[?] and those only in question[?]

On lawyer's slang if lawyer's slang must be said - in the language of mischief - every such engagement is in its nature void.

What then? is it then that no such incorporation ought to have taken place? or that in the taking place of any such incorporate union no engagements ought to have been entered into? No security for the Minor

In case of inequality (and always without inequality no such incorporation ever took place or will take place) in case of inequality shall no security be given to the minor kingdom /state/ against the overweening /irresistible/ power actuated by /force of/ the predominant interest by which after the incorporation that which was the major state will not /the probity of the majority of the rulers natures[?] as they will actually be of/ cause[?] to be affected?