1
results found in
2 ms
Page 1
of 1
9 Decr 1801
Maximum
1
It has been observed – and with great appearance of truth that the interest of
the Vendor {and Grower} of corn is always the same as that of the public in all
conjunctures /at all times/.
It certainly is so at a time of moderate plenty: it may be so at the time of a
slight degree of scarcity. It as certainly is not /But It seems by no means
equally clear that it is/ so in a time of extraordinary scarcity. In a time of
extraordinary scarcity it is the interest of the public that the price should
rise to {the degree sufficient to produce the utmost degree of economy
consistent with the preservation of the lives and healths of the inhabitants of
the inhabitants. /such a degree of economy as shall if possible be sufficient to
keep the supply from being exhausted in any superior degree before the time when
the first crop assisted by such intermediate supplies as shall have been
obtained from abroad shall have come to its relief./ That the price should rise
thus high is also the interest of the grower and vendor of the articles of
subsistence. But at that point the union of interests stops /interests
separate/. It is not the interest of the public /consumer/ that the price should
rise a single step beyond this mark. It is the interest of the grower and dealer
that it should keep on rising above this mark as high as possible.
In the case of a moderate stock what makes it the interest of the Grower and the
vendor that the price should not rise beyond /above/ a certain mark is that if
it were to rise above the mark the diminution might be so great that by the
commencement of the next harvest they might find a
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1