1823. Sept.3

Constitutional Code

IV. Features, supposed apt, which not being found in the Jury

System are here, in the Quasi-Jury systems introduced.

So far as they have correspondent and opposite features in

the Jury system then have

been already mentioned

1. Division of the every Quasi Jury into two sections: 1 the

more erudite: 2. the more popular: the more erudite: the more

popular the more numerous, than in case of disagreement the

will of the those who belong to more numerous section may preponderate over the

will of those who belong to the less numerous

section. the more those who belong to erudite section introduced that by the

influence of understanding over understanding, then

who may be supposed positive to result in intellectual aptitude.

in whose intellectual aptitude may be refracted very guide

than who in whose instance appropriate moral aptitude

is most more probable, in so far as they think as proper to

be so guided

2 Allowing Allotting to the Jury Quasi Jury by law in express terms,

and thence with more comparativeness and more constant -surer effect the several functions herein

designated by the a several adjuncts auditors, sub tive,

and consonant, and with more comparative effect than has

place in the case of a the Jury.

3. Stating in express terms the notion of the explanations

expected at the hands of the Judge for the use of the

Quasi Jury as also for the use of the others herein-after members

of the Public Opinion Tribunal.

4. Ordaining the registration of the discourses of the Quasi

Jurymen as well as those of the Judge is for the purpose of subjecting

to responsibility these to the Judge in case of una discourse on this

past: and the Judge himself in case of disregard shown to

this discourse when its loth to regard shall appear unimpeachable.

5. Admission In to the requests secured, to any alterations amendment proposed by the

Quasi Jury or any member of it to the terms of the decision

debarred by the Judge: yet to us the Judge shall remain

at liberty to pay what regard to it he thinks proper: remaining thus

with his responsibility undiminished: the amendment

going after of common to the Judge Appelation for his adoption rejection, or modification.