5 June 1803

Evidence

Best

II - Substance

4. Real with Personal

5. Fifth comparison - comparison between real /personal/ evidence and personal /real/. From a comparison between these two species of evidence thus disparate little practical use can be derived. They can never com in competition with each other; and it is seldom that either can supersede the other. Supposing them on opposite sides, from the observation /mere statement/ that on the one side the evidence is of the real kind, on the other side, of the personal kind, it is impossible to say with reason which preponderates. Real evidence without personal is scarcely susceptible of being so compleatly satisfactory as personal is without real: or indeed of being significantly satisfactory to afford a reasonable ground for decision of itself. [...?] being assumed, for the purpose of persuasion personal evidence, may by the number of the witnesses be strengthened by the number of the members to such a degree as to render real evidence superfluous: but /whereas/ in some cases (for example in cases of disputes concerning boundaries) the matter of fact in question is not capable of being so much as conceived without the help of real evidence. If for this purpose the evidence be viewed by other eyes than those of th Judge, as is very /most/ commonly the case - at least in English judicature it is a sort of real evidence at second-hand - a sort of composite evidence - supposed real evidence exhibited /exhibiting itself/ through the medium of personal evidence.

Suppose evidence of both these descriptions obtainable /forthcoming/ on one and the same side, it is impossible to say /conclude/, from the mere contemplation of the specific difference, that either is superfluous: in this or that particular /individual/ case, it may happen that the body of real evidence which the case affords which may be rendered superfluous by the body of personal evidence: but so may any one part of the body of personal evidence by the rest.

Note

( ) The case is otherwise as will be seen, as between Hearsay oral evidence and original and original /direct/ oral evidence: as likewise as between transcriptions written evidence, and the original from whence it was transcribed.