PRIVATE

[...?] Dec r 1806

Scotch Reform To L d Grenville

(8)[?] (1)

Resolut.

Interlocution [...?]

VI [...?] [...?]

A circumstance that may perhaps be not altogether void of instruction, is - that of the bar so inexorably opposed to Appeals against Interlocutory Judgments considered as addressed to the House of Lords, is not in any the smallest part of its extent opposed to Appeals against Judgments of the same description when considered as addressed to the projected Chamber of Review. To the Chamber of Review Appeals against Interlocutory Judgments may pour in without stint[?]: from that seat of novel justice to the House of Lords not a single one must transpire.

Here then comes a dilemma for the solution of which I must beg leave to refer Your Lordship to the learned Author of this plan of reformation:- if appeals against interlocutory judgments are not necessary to justice, how can they be allowed to the Chamber of Review:- if necessary, how come they to be prohibited to be made to the House of Lords?