094-136]

23 Dec r 1806

Scotch Reform To L d Grenville

Resolut. 6

Jury

Such being the properties of the proposed trial by Jury I will now beg leave to state to your Lordship, why Your Lordship has heard so much for it - nothing at all against it - why the members of the Scotch Bar, as well as those brethren of the English Bar - are so fond of it. It will then rest with Your Lordship to say /judge/ whether the good peoples of Scotland who are in question - to say nothing of their fellow subjects in England who are not in question -have the same reason to be fond of it.

In England at Common Law a hearing with a Jury stands in

lieu of a hearing without a Jury: and thus /it is then/ though a Jury cause consumes some hundreds of hours as much time as the same individual cause would in a Court of Conscience, it consumes less time than it would in Scotland. But in Scotland, as proposed, at least for any thing that appears in the Resolutions, every hearing with a Jury will be to much superadded to a hearing without a Jury: a cause /suit/ in the English stile, or at least the only useful part of it, superadded to a suit in the Scotch stile. in a word Trial of an Issue[?] sent out of any one of the three Chambers will be like /really[?]/ Trial of an Issue[?] sent out of an English Court of Equity. The learned combatants, after having /under favour[?] of an /the/ unbounded - however[?]/ exhausted their stock of ammunition in the shape of written eloquence the learned combatants will, have to renew the combat in the shape of the war of tongues, under a limited mendacity licence, the privilege denied to witnesses, extended /confined/ only to the representers and misrepresenters and suppliers of their evidence.