[094-157v]

16 Apr. 1807

To L d Grenville

Letter V

Proper Procedure[?]

Permitt me once more, to beg your Lordship's attention to the distinction between malâ fides and bonâ fides. In this /On this/ as in so many other cases /as [...?] every thing turns upon it // on so many other occasions/, it is a cardinal one: the whole enquiry hinges on it.

In such instance, the Appeal Writ of Error or by whatever name the innovation made of the controling authority of the superordinate Court be diminuated, will be a malâ fide Appeal, or a bonâ fide: he by whom it is made will be conscious of his not having the right on his side, or his mind will be clear of that immoral consciousness.

In both instances the effect of the system will be to increase the number of appeals: and to come at once to the really material part of the question - will increase the aggregate mass of collateral inconvenience, in the shape of delay, vexation and expense, flowing from that source, and without producing any preponderant advantage in the shape of security against misdecision.

In the two cases its tendency runs /operates/ upon two widely different grounds. I consider it therefore upon each, beginning with the case of the malâ fide

appellant, whose existence Your Lordship's learned reformer has I hope brought himself by this time to [...?].