23[?] Aug 1809

Parl y Reform

Bribery & Corruption

From the practice of bribery, as applied to electors one consequence there is which in my eyes is a mischievous one, productive of a mischief which in my view of it has been sufficient to bespeak /secure/ my endeavours - and those not sham but sincere and honest ones, for /towards/ the prevention of it.

This is the giving to /a/ candidates whose sole qualification may consist in opulence, the exclusive possession of these seats, to the utter exclusion of men of talents and industry, qualifications to /with/ which though a degree of affluence above that of the labouring and most numerous classes is necessary, a certain quantity of wealth /degree of affluence/ is little less than incompatible.

This in my view of the matter is sufficient - to oppose to every idea of having bribery unprevented not only an objection, but that a peremptory one.

But those men, those that in terms of such convenient ambiguity, maintain that "property ought to have a predominating influence on the Election of Members" +, those men whose opinion it is that a man who can not shew himself to be in possession of ,600 or ,300 neat[?] income in a particular form ought not to be permitted to sit in the House, by whatsoever numbers of electors deemed the fittest of all men that could be placed there - with what consistency can such an exclusion be ranked under the head of evil in their estimate?

+ Speaker's Speech Cobbett

King's 10[?] Jan[?] 1809

N.B. This only for the moment: till a proper[?] example can be found: his words not warranting it.