1
results found in
2 ms
Page 1
of 1
14 Oct r 1809 P.I
Parl y Ref. m B. II. Influence. Ch. {1.}/3/
{Explanations} /Modes of Corruption/
Ordinary modes
2
{1. Of the different shapes &c[?] viz. money &c it depends on
idiosyncrasy which creates most dependence
2. / 2/ Fear of ablation makes more dependence than hope of
collation.
3. / 1/ Benefit in expectancy no matter the shape: values, what
he would pay for it
4. By a benefit already conferred on a friend no dependence except by gratitude: it
not being generally ablatible.
I Value to dependents
5. Drawbacks from value on
1. Labour – ex. gr. of others
2. Punishment or infamy[?] as in case of bribe
6. Corroboration of dependence of obsequiousness – on
1. Gratitude (the sympathy)
2. Obligation to gratitude by force of popular sanction
7. By expectation a single benefit may keep any numbers of Members or Electors in
dependence and obsequiousness }
II. Value to patron
1.
8. 1 greater, the more valuable to dependent
2. the less merit it requires on the part of dependent: because
1. The more merit requisite the fewer he is able to demand[?] in de dependence.
2. the less likely it is that his personal favourites, who the more obsequious they
are the more meritless they are likely to be can be provided for.
9 Of the whole of the mass of patronage the value is the greater the greater the
number of benefits conformable and the greater the value of each.
10. Useful to have a cloak to corruption. Unaware[?] is that cloak […?] the as[?]
steward.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1