16 Sep 1809

K[?] 5 Sep. 1809

Parl y Ref m Necessity. Ch. Kings dependence

necessary

3

20

§ 3 Kings dependence […?] Hanover & Hampshire

1.

To gratify the King, Hanover and Hampshire under two successive Reigns put upon a

par. p5.

2.

Had the interests of the people formed an ingredient in their calculations, no such

rapprochement would have been made. p.5.

3.

The declaration thus made by Fox and Grenville furnishes them by Ord[…?], as little

capable of being effected, as the conquering Spanish America for the Junta p.6.

4.

Had the King turned over Hanover to one of his sons, the King w d

have been none the Poorer, and his son would have been placed in the same condition

as the king of Wirtemberg. p.6

3 (a)

Note from Dodington. p.6

4 (a)

Blessed condition of the people! Under a party the two heads of which have not

scrupled to avow that they cared no more for their country than for Hanover! – and

that even the party should be a resource!