1
results found in
2 ms
Page 1
of 1
1820 Aug. 26
Emancipation Spanish
'. 10. Amendment impossible
Either then there must be a seond Cortes having existence at the same time with the
first, or no second Cortes can have existence till near 8 months after the expiration
of the present one viz. till 9 July 1823 or the present one must continue in
existence near eitht months beyong /over and above/ the time allowed to it by the
unchangabel /unalterable/ Constitution: or in the ultramarian provinces the election
of the deputies for the next Cortes must commence befor the dissolution of the
existing Cortes. This accordingly is what I suppose was and is intended. If as in the
case of most other represetative bodies the intention were that the deputies in a
/each/ preceding shouldd be eligible in each succeeding assembly, ther would be an
incongruity in instituting an Election of succeeding deputies, before the conduct of
the preceding one had been subjected to observation. But as [...?] a deputy who has
served in one Cortes is not allowed to serve in the next, the incongruity in question
is got rid of, though by means of an arrangement to which, /against/ as it should
have evil without reason a still greater incongruity might be objected. /imputed./
In the ultramarian provinces Art. 37 the only day on which the first of the four
election meetings can be held is the day which is exactly 15 months before the day of
the meeting of the ortes which as above is in the case of the next Cortes to be the
1 st of March 1822, or else the 9 th of July
1821 or else the 9 th of July 1822, let him who can say which. But
by that same Article 37 it must it must also be the first Sunday in December: so that
by the terms of this unalterable Constitution if the 1 st of this month
of December in the proper year whatever it is happens not to be a Sunday, there
can not in any ultramarian province be any commencement of the system of Election
to the Cortes nor consequently from every one of these provinces any deputation at
all.
Entered with amendments under
Creole deputation none)
This is yet but a small part of the difficulty /cloud/ which hangs
over the subject. Until the number of the inhabitants in the ultramarian provinces
have been ascertained and reported reported doubtless to the existing or some
futre Cortes the number of deputies which these provinces are to depute to the
Cortes can not be ascertained. For by Art. 28 29 and 31 the number of the deputies
to the Cortes and ultra as well ultramarian as Spanish is to be "one for every
70,000 souls": so that in the Cortes until men know how many souls there are in
the ultramarian provinces, they /men/ can not know how many deputies from there
there are to be.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1