July 1810 + 1

Fallacies Generalia[?] or[?] Conclusion[?]

Ch. 7 Ins [...?] [...?]

1

Consider

Outs the same person as the Euph: but their position different

The d greater or less demand they have for fallacies results from their reference[?] on their position.

Ch. or '. | | Why among the Ins the use of fallacies is more extensive than among the Outs

Ch. or '. | | Why in this work the largest space is occupied by the Fallacies of the Ins, are those which occupy the largest space.

By /On/ the bare inspection of it list, it will have been rendered obvious /evident/ to the reader /an observation that will naturally have presented itself to the reader is/ that of the three groupes into which the general stock of these has been distributed, the fallacies of the Ins are those which occupy /by which is occupied/ by far the largest space.

On the ground of this observation a natural question seems to be to what cause is to be attributed /from whence comes comes/ so great a difference /disproportion/? To one side /groupe/ of the House allotting to large a proportion of space, to the other, as well as to the groupe which are employable sometimes indifferently on either side /on one side sometimes on the other/, so small a /an one/ proportion is not this disproportion a proof of partiality, itself a sort of fallacy?

Questions these that seem to call for an answer, and an answer they shall have.