1819 May 21

Objection III

Love of liberty extinguished

Election meetings safe

14

Teeming with violence and absurdity, yes: but the more frequent, and the longer the frequency of them has continued, the less pregnant with these evils will they be Already in the United States there is less of them than here. The violence is produced by the two[?] with warranted indignation against constant and continually renewed tyranny.

3. Election Meetings are the safest of all public meetings. By legality they confer importance.

Observation. The safest, yes: viz as against the tyranny that seeks to suppress them: and spares no expence in the shape of false pretences for that purpose. In the United States all public meetings are safe: safe in both senses: safe as against tyrannical suppression by the ruling few: safe as against tumults and other disorders on the part of the subject many.

By legality they confer importance. In this is not something like an insinuation contained that for the purpose of giving this importance to one meeting in seven years it would a measure of beneficence /good for liberty/ to suppress all others? Is not this something like the head or tail of the snake peeping out of the grass?

4. They excite universal interest: as do for example the accounts given of battles.

5. “In this manner is formed democratic ascendancy: which is most perfect when the greatest numbers of independent judgments influence the measures of government.”

Bravo! democratic ascendancy! And so for the moment at least, and for the purpose of this part of the argument, the Reviewer adopts the expression, and approves the thing. Democratic ascendancy? and how to be obtained? By meetings of the people in not one third of the whole number of Election Districts by which seats are filled, and of those assembled while the greater part are excluded by distance and expence, one part brought together by intimidation another part by direct or virtual bribery, and only a minute part free.