[mainly in copyist’s hand]

1819 June 11

Parl. Reform Bill Reasons

Electors Who

Universality

Idiots Brougham

2 June 1818

1

Extract from M r Brougham’s Speech in the Debate of 2 June 1818 on Sir Francis Burdett’s Motion for Parliamentary Reform Resolution Hansard p. 1164

1 But M r Bentham was a real advocate for Universal Suffrage. He was a far more sturdy, and infinitely more consistent reformer than the hon. baronet, as he gave votes not only to all men, but to all women also. He drew no line at all; he weighed not with practical nicety the claims of different classes; he recollected that his principle was universal; he tossed away the rule and the scale altogether, and without restriction, let in all – young or old, men or women, sane or insane, all must vote – all must have a voice in Electing their Representatives. He did not even sanction the exceptions which the hon. Baronet seemed inclined to admit with respect to persons of an unsound mind. The veteran reformer (Major Cartwright) had lately favoured the world with a plan of suffrage, illustrated by plates, where balloting boxes, ball trays, stands, &c &c. in most accurate array met the eager gaze of the much edified enquirer. Now M r Bentham was the patron[?] of the Ballot, and his doctrine was, that all who can Ballot, may enjoy the elective franchise. The moment a person of either sex was able to put a pellet into a Box, no matter whether he were insane, and had one of the keepers of a mad-house to guide him, still M r Bentham said, that though he did not support the utility of allowing idiots or mad persons to vote, for their own sakes, yet, rather than make a distinction, he would allow them, as they could not do any harm, and the unbending consistency

might