1819 July 3.

Defence of Ballot & Universality against Ed. Review

II Indirect attacks

5

{1. Influence of understanding and will}

3. Judgment self-formed & derivative

Whigs […?] if annoyed by those distinctions

2. Seduction alluring and intimidative – corruption and terrorism

4 Appropriate aptitude.

5. Judica-teipsum principle.

☞ Conclude with the necessity of new names to correct predicature[?]. Instance names of Bills.

6. Terrorism vote-compelling, and competition excluding

Instances of new expressions having for their object the exclusion of misconceptions which it is the interest and thence has been the endeavour, of his Clients[?] to promote {and propagate}.

1. Influence of understanding on understanding – influence of will on will

Applied to the subject in question, (as to every other /not to speak of others/), influence of understanding on understanding is not only salutary but necessary: d o of d o of will on will unnecessary and pernicious. Whigs for the preservation and acquisition of their seats while out of office, and for the means of securing parliamentary votes in the event of their coming into office, having as well as Tories an undispensable demand for the means of exercising influence of will on will, hears[?] in his Defence of the Whigs, Lord Erskine shutting his eyes against this distinction which he might have seen and probably did see brought to view in my book and by these means /expressions/ represented all-influence, influence without distinction or exception as being salutary and necessary.