1819 Oct. 5

Parl Reform Bill

Reasons

§ 5

§ 8

Art. Secresy

3

3

3

In so far as it is by the idea of evil that the effect is produced {is endeavoured to be produced} the influence is stiled the influence of intimidation or terrorism: in so far as it is by the idea of good, the influence of corruption, of which bribery is one species: namely the coarsest and most prominent.

In all these several cases it is universally understood – assumed by every one /all/, denied by none that the influence of will on will ought not to be exercised: that an Election produced by any such means is a Miselection: a Miselection, to wit in principle, howsoever /whatsoever/ it may happen to be by law. A circumstance by which the universality of this undertaking is testified is the sentiment of disapprobation which stands associated with these words, and which fails not to be called forth as often as they are mentioned.

That it is universally understood that no influence of will on will ought thus to be employed in giving direction to votes – that election produced by such influence is Miselection even according to law, is established in the case of both these opposite modes of influence.

That by influence of the intimidative kind operating with effect Miselection is understood to be produced is declared by the law or custom of Government under which Soldiers /Military Band/ under the command of the Monarch are removed from all places in which Elections are held.

That by influence of the corruptive kind, operating with effect Miselection is understood to be produced is declared by those Statutes which in such multitude and with so much effect have been the professed intention of preventing Election bribery.