1
results found in
2 ms
Page 1
of 1
12 Decr 1801
Maximum
Beginning
4
The effect of a combination is rather to fix prices, than to urge them on at an
indefinitely encreasing rate. In the case of a combination, it is but natural
that they should be /the rate /mark/ at which they are/ fixed by it, /should be/
at too high a rate /mark/: but at that too high rate /mark at any rate/ they are
fixed. It is by competition the very reverse of combination that prices are
spurred up to a continually encreasing height. While the price is as yet no
higher than a double price, dealers crowd in upon a farmer to buy it at that
double price cash apprehending that if he does not now submitt to get it at so
high a price, he will he knows not how soon not be able to get it at less than a
treble price. The farmer observing this eagerness, and inferring /looking to/ a
general and proportionally encreasing scarcity as the cause of it, rises
accordingly in his demand. Why should he not? if he foregoes his share in the
profit, he will but throw it entire into the hands of his {more prudent and
determined} neighbours. If combination were /had been/ the cause, there must
have been an uninterrupted chain of prices successively fixed by it, with a
convention of farmers or corndealers or farmers and corndealers continually
sitting and setting illegal assizes of corn with as much regularity as the legal
assizes are set in the case of
bread.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1