1
results found in
1 ms
Page 1
of 1
14 Dec.r 1801
Maximum
Conclusion
1
Even Supposing, if I may be allowed so to do for argument’s sake the utility and
success as well as the adoption of the measure, it will require no small degree
of the purest and rarest sort of public spirit as well as firmness /fortitude/
on the part of government /administrators/ to embrace it /to propose it/. I know
/can think/ of no state of things in which any very general approbation could
reasonably be expected for it. If after the establishment of the maximum price
the actual price should continue every where below it, the law could then be
said, with or without reason, to be without effect: if the actual price should
have risen every where or any where to the maximum price, the encrease of price
might, and by many naturally would be attributed not to the scarcity, but to the
law: in the first case, your law is inefficacious /useless/ - it would be said –
in the other, mischievous. In the first case, does it absolutely follow from the
mere state of the case that the law will have been useless – that it can not
have contributed any thing to the keeping down of the price? The answer is more
than I could undertake to give with confidence. I see no absurdity in the
supposition, that the acknowledged /recognized/ impossibility of seeing the
actual
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1