1
results found in
1 ms
Page 1
of 1
30 Oct. 1801
27 Aug. 1801
C 3
Polit. Economy
Method
III. Non Agenda
I. Broad Measures
3. Encouragement
4[?] Encreasing Land
{3}6 Colonies
1
6. Colonization {is} {or at least was} was a folly grafted on a folly.
Encouragement to new productive industry exercised at home, gave actual
production /wealth/ for actual production /wealth/. Colonization, for actual
wealth gives /gave nothing but/ contingent; contingent, which at the best was
distant, and of which the realization was in all cases uncertain, in some
hopeless. The capital employed in the exportation and maintenance of the
colonists and their stock would if employ'd at home at any rate have added
something to the annually growing wealth as well as population and thence the
defencible security of the home territory, by the whole amount of it. Of the
maintenance /produce/ of the Colonists when settled in the Colony it is only a
part that would be exported to the home /mother/ country and constituted a
portion of its /be added to the mass of its/ wealth.
In point of wealth /quantity/ and population, Europe has lost by colonies. The
only gain, if any, is that which consists in mere enjoyment, and that so far,
and no farther, as it depends on novelty and variety in regard to the articles
or instruments of enjoyment: the use of sugar /using sugar cane sugar/ instead
of honey or beet or maple sugar - the making tea, coffee and chocolate
breakfasts instead of the meat and ale breakfasts that contented Queen
Elizabeth: the adding cochineal and indigo to our {blue} dies, instead of being
confined to woad, Prussian Blue and a few others: the using: the using cochineal
and garnetts for dying our clothes, instead of other reds of somewhat inferior
brilliancy.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1