1
results found in
2 ms
Page 1
of 1
1820 Oct. 9 Spanish liberticide measures Lett. 3 Public discussion Meeting
licensing Speeches 2. Colony Minister
If there be no want of probity, […? …?] is the want of logic here. But by want
of logic not less than by want of probity must […?] be destroyed.
Still Worse than this if there be any thing worse must the people of Spain have
to forgive ere their salvation is accomplished.
The Minister of the Colonies according to the reports made of his speech, makes
reference to England. As to the state of the law in this respect in England, and
nothing can be more notorious, either my conception of the matter is altogether
erroneous, or his is. ‘Permanent Societies’ (says he) ‘are unknown unless
authorized by the Law.’ Permanent societies not authorized by the Law are well
known: that of the Free Masons for example, the permanence of which has been –
in the world as long (say they) as from Solomon’s time to the present, if that
is long enough for him, and in England really so long that nobody knows the
commencement of it. In England to establish a Society for any purpose not
expressly forbidden by Statute Law, nor by the sham Law called Common Law
treated as if it were so, requires no more authorization than eating and
drinking does: and when once established, whatsoever permenence the members
agree in giving to it belongs to it of course. The statement given by this
Minister is a curiosity in its kind: seldom at the expence of so little
falsehood asserted has so much been insinuated. Next time it is his pleasure to
make reference to Representative Governments I would submit it to him, whether
it might not be as well /better/ to take an instance where Representation is a
reality than where it is an imposture. In the United States there are two and
twenty such realities for him to choose out of: in England there is this one
imposture. After this will he stand up in his place and say that he does not
know it to be an imposture: he will be a bolder man than from this speech of his
I should
The Free Masons who in England at least never hurt a worm nor so much as
threatened one. But why mention the Free Masons Society? Only because of its
existence and its innocence not even Mr Gorelli could have been ignorant. For if
he is curious to see any more such, let him give me a notice a piece for as many
as I can shew him his salary as Deputy will soon find its way out of his pocket.
Till the late liberticide Acts, penned as if Mr Gorelli had been penman, there
was no other limit to the number of those Societies than to the number of those
who took it into their head to form them.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1