[lxxxiv. 4]

1821 Decr 1

Codification Proposal

penult

?.5. Draughtsman Single

/Appendix/

Sinister Interest.

Put this analysis of sinister interest after or before the case of singleness?

Such being the exposure to sinister interest taken in the aggregate, a question that can scrace fail to present itself is © what shapes /what are the shapes/ do these sources of [...?...?]? /present themselves?/ /operate?/ To this question some answer can scarce fail to be expected.

These interests may be distinguished in the first place into sinister interests of universal application, and sinister interests of local application

Sinister interests of universal application may be all of them be comprized /comprehended/ under two heads: namely 1. Statesman's sinister interest and Lawyers's sinister interests.

In all these several cases /situations/ the sinister interests themselves are much the same. they have their root in that nature which belongs in common to the whole species, the [?] Springs of action The difference consists principally if not exclusively in the occasions which different situations afford for giving effect to those sinister interests which

1. Kings sinister interests detailed © His means of giving effect to his sinister interests

2. Representatives sinister interests detailed: their means of giving effect to their sinister interests

3. Lawyers' sinister interests detailed: their means of giving effect to their sinister interests.

4. Local sinister interest

First state universal interest © Maximum Subsistance © abundance security and practical equality: referring to ?. 2. Rationale.