8 Feb y 1808

IV. Day of Sitting

The determination /decision/ of the Court of Session, I mean of the clever art of its 15 Judges is - that the Chambers meaning what the Bill calls the divisions of the Court, these[?] Chambers whether there be two or three of them shall "only sit alternately".

What is the grand grievance? /One main grievance //At the head of the list of grievances stands this -// that the decisions of the Court of Session are years in arrear, and that it is in a way[?] to measure[?] /the arrear there seems no bounds to its probable measure[?]/.

Such being the grievance nothing can be more obvious, more effectual /infallible/ than the remedy. Instead of one judiciary, establish two, both sitting at the same time: each having but half the business to do in the same quantity of time, the quantity of time applied to the business will be the double of that it is at present. Of one judicatory the number of which are determined not to preserve the repose [...?] for almost [...?] end two months together, the quantity of time allowed as not sufficient for the business /the quantity/ which calls for it: but it is not so far from sufficient but that double the quantity of time would be compleatly so - since[?] then the numbers of the one judicatory will not give up any part of the time dedicated to repose, establish two judicatories, both /each/ sitting at the same time with those[?] on which the one judicatory sits at present. By this means the quantity of time applied to the business will be exactly doubled.