1
results found in
2 ms
Page 1
of 1
1819 Jan y 16
Parl. Reform Bill
Dialogue
Preliminary View
Evils & Remedies
II Remedies
Miselection
Election
Qualification
3 Scholarship
12
Anti-Reformist. Well – to be sure /Doubtless/, Scholarship – I mean in the same
degree of it which you have in view is a very /mighty/ good thing: it is what on all
sides of the question we are all so anxious to give the utmost possible extension to.
But are you aware how you are thus departing from your principles thus adding
exclusion to exclusion? Is there no inconsistency in thus shutting the door not only
against so many Non-Adults to whom it might have been left /thrown/ open, but even to
Adults in countless numbers? Among your professed[?] principles has been that of
excluding as far as possible, all sensible evil – if not all discontent, that being
impossible, all discontent founded on just cause. Will not discontent and according
to you just /well grounded/ discontent be let in, by shutting out Adults, and in such
vast /incalculable/ numbers.
Reformist. No inconsistency – no well-grounded discontent – if I do not greatly
miscalculate, if I do not greatly deceive myself in misjudgement of the men I have to
deal with, no discontent well or ill grounded. Consider how plain[?] it can not but
be to every one of these, how sincerely not only the general good /benefit/ but his
own individual benefit is aimed at by the condition thus imposed: how surely and
compleatly it will be in his power to fulfill it, and with no more trouble than so
many thousands have already submitted to take upon themselves, and without any such
then unthought of reward as is now for the first time offered to his hands:
Long
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1