1
results found in
2 ms
Page 1
of 1
1818 Dec. 22
Parl. Reform Bill
Dialogue II
Election Evils
25
6
Anti-Reformist. Come then, set to work your exhaustion-pump: give us /produce/ your
divisions: if they suit my taste /I like them/ they please me/ I will call them
logical ones: if they do not suit my taste /I dont like them/ /they displease me/ I
will call them metaphysical. Let us both be at liberty you produce what you please: I
give what name to it I please.
Reformist. Agreed: First then, these Election evils I divide them into
characteristic and uncharacteristic or not characteristic.
Anti-Reformist. What do you here mean by characteristic?
Reformist. I mean such evils as have are not only liable to have place on the
occasion of the sort /mode/ of Election in question, but could not have place without
it.
Anti-Reformist. Then by your uncharacteristic evils you mean such evils as are
liable to have place on the occasion in question, but are moreover liable to have
place on other occasions. {Well, your characteristic Election evils what are they.}
{Reformist. Before I tell you what they are I must divide them in the first place
into hurtful | | the mischief of which falls upon men in their public capacity alone,
such the /injurious to the public alone, evils hurtful to individuals only and evils
hurtful to the public and to individuals, both at the same time/. }
Reformist. Exactly so. It is a real satisfaction /comfort/ to me, to see you thus
beforehand /going before/ with me.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1