1821 May 17

These distinctions noted, the general case will be found resolvable

into these seven particular ones.

1. Case 1. Functionary, on whose will the ultimate efficiency of the

Draught depends, a single person: namely the Monarch: Draughtsman

that same individual.

2. case 2. Functionary, on whose will the ultimate efficiency of the

Draught depends, a single person - the Monarch - as before:

Draughtsman, acting in subjection to that will, a single

individual.

3. Case 3. Functionary, on whose will the ultimate efficiency of

the draught depends, a single person - the Monarch -

as before: Draughtsmen, acting in subjection to that will,

divers. In English practice a Board - or a Commission

is the aggregate denomination by which a set of functionaries, thus

appointed are in this case customarily designated.

4. Case 4. Functionaries, on whose will the ultimate

efficiency of the draught depends, divers: namely an aristocratical body: Draughtsmen,

those same individuals acting all of them without exception in the composition of

the draught.

5. Case 5. Functionaries, on whose will the ultimate

efficiency of the Draught depends an aristocratical

body as before: Draughtsmen occupied in the work

a part of the whole number of the members of that same body.

selected by the rest. In English practice, A Committee is the aggregate

denomination by which a set of functionaries thus appointed

are denominated.

6. Case 6. Functionaries, on whose will the ultimate efficiency

of the Draught depends, an aristocratical body, as

before: Draughtsman occupied in the work and acting in

subjection to that will, a single individual.

7. Case 7. Functionaries, on whose will the ultimate efficiency

of the Draught depends, an aristocratical body, as

before: Draughtsmen occupied in the work and acting in subjection

to that will, divers individuals as above.