1
results found in
2 ms
Page 1
of 1
1821. April 16
First Lines
Means
Distributive
4. Equality
By the conjunct operation of all these causes taken together, to the maintenance of
each individual, whose powers were thus applicable to the defence of the community, a
mass of property, continually kept on foot, was indispensably necessary. In the
possession of any such individual, suppose a mass of property sufficient, but not
more than sufficient, for this purpose. If, upon his decease, this mass of property
were to be subjected to division, the national force would thus be bereft of one of
its constituent parts: and, in a state of society in which the cultivation of the
means of subsistence have /had/ made so small a progress, so small was the number of
the individuals thus equipped, no individual could be subtracted from the number
without sensible diminution of national security.
The exigencies and habits of acting produced by this state of things, have long been
at an end every where. But the habits of thinking produced by it are scarcely at an
end anywhere. From all labour, employed in the production of the means of
subsistence, and the matter of abundance, all persons thus engaged in the defence of
the community sttood exempted, partly by necessity, in respect of the need of the
application of it to their military function, partly by the power it gave them /they
had/ of exacting from their labour for those and other purposes for their own use.
In regard to exposure to the necessity of labour, from the state of things has been
produced, in the minds of a certain portion of the community, a division of the
members of that same community with two classes: one composed of those in whose
instance the need of employing labour in the acquisition of subsistence and abundance
is no hardship: another composed of those in whose instance the need /and so on/ is a
hardship
To
The
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1