1
results found in
2 ms
Page 1
of 1
1821. Jan y. 1 ' Revised 1822 March 20
Rid Yourselves of Ultramaria
Note
Introduction
'. 6. Tables - grounds of the opinion
Note (a) to Table 1.
(a) In this Table, under the head of Indian
Revenue, vast differences will be found between some periods and others. For
solution of the difficulty, the observation made by Townsend is that, when the amounts are so large it is the gross revenue that is given; when they are so small the net revenue. By net, what he seems to have meant
is - that part, which found its way into the treasury is
Spain: by gross, the whole of
what was collected in America and Spain together: the rest
being expended, in the countries in and from which it was collected. At the same
time, you have seen him insisting that " the Spanish Colonies
yield no direct revenue to the Mother Country": and the time, in relation to
which this is said, is little distant from the times, at which, if the above
supposition be correct, they are stated by him as yielding to the Mother Country
considerable sums: namely Reals vellon 39,899,918 on an average of 10 years ending
1778; and 60,000,000 reals vellon, on an average of 5 years, ending 1785. To
reconcile the general assertion with these articular accounts, we must suppose, that,
on the occasion of the general assertion, he took into consideration that part of the
expenditure of Spain which, being made in Spain on account of Spanish America, was
drawn from Spain: namely of the total expenditure of Spain in Spain, that part, which was bestowed upon such parts, of the Army,
Navy, Judicial and Financial establishments respectively the demand for which was
produced by the dominion exercised in Spanish America by the Spanish rulers. On this
supposition, the expenditure, in Spain on account of Spanish America, being deducted from the net amount of the receipt in Spain from Spanish
America,- the balance, according to his abovementioned general assertion, was
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1