1
results found in
2 ms
Page 1
of 1
1820. Dec r. 22 d.
Rid yourselves of Ultramaria
' 10 Creoles willing
In the way of trade - meaning free trade - no benefit, in any shape, can be
derivable to the subject many in Spain, from any such dominion. To the trading of any
one country with any other, and deriving whatsoever benefit, independently of
coercive laws, is derivable from such trading, it is neither necessary nor conducive,
that either should exercise dominion over the other. By no instruments, can dominion
extract money from those subject to it but by coercive laws. But, in so far as they
are applied to the purpose of extracting money at the expence of those subject to
them, coercive laws are taxing laws: and of these I have just been speaking. That, in
the way of free trade, dominion and coercive laws out of the question, Spain will
derive from Ultramaria more benefit, in proportion to capital employed, than can be
derived from that source by any other country, is a position, the proof of which
shall be laid before you in its place. +
If instead while you put a tax upon goods exported from Peninsular to Ultramarian
Spain, you protected /prevent no such to prevent/ Ultramarian Spain from producing
those same goods at home and at the same time from importing them from any country
other than Peninsular Spain, by so doing, in so far as the tax upon the goods is paid
your rulers will be deriving increase from Peninsular Spain. But in so doing they
will be imposing in this way a tax upon Ultramarian Spain: which tax they will just
as fully understand to be a tax upon them, as if it were on Ultramaria itself that
the produce was received by functionaries employed there by your rulers.
+ See Letter 16. Relinquishment profitable.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1